Again ...
It was the MOST fringe groups who earliest and MOST ACCURATELY described who Hitler was; what he would become and what he would do.
--Dr James H F (owner of world's best private collection of pre-Hitler posters, leaflets, pamphlets, broadsides etc).
You can black-wash all such information from all such sources if you wish. You can establish an extremely narrow, rigid criteria that demands laboratory level "proof," if you wish. You can bend over backwards to avoid making a false positive error, if you wish.
But all you'll be doing is cheating yourself out of valuable--maybe critical, life-saving information. And, you'll be setting yourself up for certain repeated false negative errors--automatically.
That’s our modern judicial system in a nutshell.
You have to understand I worked a lot with criminally insane such as patients who believed their brains and backs were chipped by the CIA and we'd have to give x-rays to rule out such psychosis. These patients( many) were all labeled paranoid schizophrenics. Now, you want to prove the fringe conspiracies and yes with more than what I've read or seen, go for it. But some of the people posting ( not here) I do wonder about their psyches.
I'm interested in Q, not personal attacks. Your own words has me wondering why you just checked your first paragraphs. Last paragraph you wrote is exactly why I stand back and read-"false positives."
And no, I do not believe all that is written. Not at all.You should not either. Below are your own words :
But all you'll be doing is cheating yourself out of valuable--maybe critical, life-saving information. And, you'll be setting yourself up for certain repeated false negative errors--automatically.
Are you agreeing with me or slamming me for not believing all that is written?Again, you wish to attack me as a close minded person, go for it. Bye now. Guess this group isn't made out to be as advertised.