You have to understand I worked a lot with criminally insane such as patients who believed their brains and backs were chipped by the CIA and we'd have to give x-rays to rule out such psychosis. These patients( many) were all labeled paranoid schizophrenics. Now, you want to prove the fringe conspiracies and yes with more than what I've read or seen, go for it. But some of the people posting ( not here) I do wonder about their psyches.
I'm interested in Q, not personal attacks. Your own words has me wondering why you just checked your first paragraphs. Last paragraph you wrote is exactly why I stand back and read-"false positives."
And no, I do not believe all that is written. Not at all.You should not either. Below are your own words :
But all you'll be doing is cheating yourself out of valuable--maybe critical, life-saving information. And, you'll be setting yourself up for certain repeated false negative errors--automatically.
Are you agreeing with me or slamming me for not believing all that is written?Again, you wish to attack me as a close minded person, go for it. Bye now. Guess this group isn't made out to be as advertised.
I don’t recall emphatically saying one way or the other that you did xyz. I cautioned against being so lopsided in avoiding false positives that you became a certain victim of false negatives. The msg I’m replying to sounds much more fair-minded than your first one. Thanks for your kind reply. Was not trying to slam you as a person, at all.