I had a thought.
Looks like someone here is nailing down the Q posting schedule frequency figured out.
Along those lines, there is ‘future proves past’.
What I have not found yet is a succinct accounting of Q posts vs. ‘events becoming real’.
One of the reasons why Q has decided to work this way is so that when this comes down, the Q group can use this record to establish credibility in their ability to be a national authority.
Goes to Q’s point recently about Justice. To paraphrase, “You want arrests? Who’s going to do that? Justice? FBI? Certainly not CIA.”
If what Q is foreshadowing comes about, and based on their track record it appears that it eventually will, there will have to be an alternative ‘news’ source that people can trust.
So far, no ‘accounting’ has been done between actual events taking place and Q posts. In fact, I think Q did some of this itself (May 4th post).
BOOM accountability too. Looking at the autist effort in general, I think some accounting needs to be done on our own.
1. It will tamp down the yowlers. You just refer to the ‘ledger’ and tell the to shut up. Really, that would be all.
2. It would provide a framework in which to place the pieces of the mosaic of events that eventually have to happen in order for the cabal to go down (which is the first, and a very dangerous step).
3. We wouldn’t have to trust Q, and frankly, I don’t think Q is looking for either trust or love. That group is working from a sense of duty, and imminent danger. The ‘Q’ thing is a way to bring the rest of us along, slowly but surely, until the revelations come out, and they will be so bad, so incomprehensible, they will sound absurd.
Q, like the USMC, doesn’t want robots. I think Q wants razors, and people who are self-organized enough to question what is going on around them - now and for the rest of our lives. Lord knows the Media isn’t going to do that work. We are now the media. We are the free press.
Conclusion - We have to do our own accounting of Q’s posts, and their relationship to the real world. I believe before long that ledger will be the pillar of credibility against which the disinformation sources will dash itself.
It will be so much harder for the Corsi’s and others to lead folks astray. In intelligence, a source is graded in three ways: 1) was it accurate; 2) was it timely; 3) was it credible (prior to the event, based on placement of the source).
With this ledger, it will be way easier to make these calls.
Anyway, I’m just thinking out loud. The Anon community is frayed, and there is so much disinfo out there than you can hardly hear yourself think. I think we need this to cut through the sh!t.
I don’t propose I be the one to run it, because I would suck at it, and it isn’t what I used to do.
However, I like the ‘Trust No One’ approach, and believe a ledger is the only way to do it.
Thoughts?
I think we also need to keep in mind that FReeQs, here on FR, are NOT the primary audience for Q. 8chan is.
Enjoy the show.
That is a TRUE STATEMENT. Well said.
Thoughts?
It's a great idea to keep a Free Republic tally of Q vs. reality. I would be almost tempted to do it, but it would be hopeless for me to try and keep up as I work full time. (Taking a day off today.)
Maybe Swordmaker could do it.
Your idea. You should stay involved. See that the result matches the vision & purpose. Just my opinion.
Try this link.
http://we-go-all.net/q-clearance-archive.pdf
A great amount of time went into the Q Proofs found in this document.