Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA
-- I also remember ?three? quarterly renewal requests -- some (all?) signed by RR... --

The list I prepared has the original October 2016 request and three quarterly renewals. Out of those four instances, RR signed the last one, and only the last one.

-- I think I perceive the plan for a grand entrapment -- with the exposure to come -- not from Trump or Sessions -- but, from Judges. --

Or from Congress. I think the judicial stepping in was a windfall surprise, not designed.

-- Now, what remains to be seen, I guess, is RR's [unredacted] charge to Mule... --

That is by far not the only thing!

Funny thought. All the "Sessions is not aggressive enough" criticism, ID's Holder as a strong AG. So when Sessions ignores being held in contempt, and ignores subpoenas, he's behaving as Holder, a strong AG.

DOJ has responded to Nunes announcement that DOJ ignored his "classified letter." DOJ says it responded to it, didn't ignore it. Needs careful parsing - Nunes may have said SESSIONS (not DOJ) ignored it, so DOJ saying that it replied is not-responsive to the charge from Nunes. On Maria Bartiromo around 10:32 this morning.

963 posted on 05/06/2018 10:13:24 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 959 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Couldn’t remember who prepared the timeline on the FISA warrants Thought wildhighlander or Jane had sent it to me. Iirc the last that RR signed had NO changes and therefore should have been denied. Because it wasn’t Should show that at least part of t he FISA judges were also part of the cabal. Reason enough IMO for RR to set up the sting!

Can you please repost the Fisa warrant time table? Thank you.


971 posted on 05/06/2018 10:28:58 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT Hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
There was an earlier 2016 request that was rejected by the FISA Court.
981 posted on 05/06/2018 10:57:05 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Sessions is not aggressive enough" criticism, ID's Holder as a strong AG. So when Sessions ignores being held in contempt, and ignores subpoenas, he's behaving as Holder, a strong AG

Not exactly what people like me are saying. Holder was a corrupt AG protecting a corrupt President. He showed how easy it is to be a firewall between any investigation and Presidential action. He was in sync with his President, and made sure no one would get a chance to know what was really going on. Sessions is allowing a corrupt DOJ and DS to attack the President he serves. He is not showing his courage by letting the DOJ hide and obfuscate all their nefarious activities over the last 2 years. He is being wimply. He was not a firewall between the DS and the President, he allowed himself to be taken out of the equation entirely and let a DS Deputy create a firestorm that the President has to deal with every day from a phony allegation that everyone, including RR, knows is phony. The difference between Holder and Sessions is that Sessions is not serving his President by taking on those who would attack him with legal actions and investigations. If Sessions wanted to by like Holder, he would be going after Trump's enemies and exposing all the FISA abuses, among many other things.

1,066 posted on 05/06/2018 2:06:38 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson