Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

I think you may be overlooking the redacted sections of the authorizations. Since the SC claims they are not relevant to the Manafort issues, they could be targeting the HRC campaign.


1,156 posted on 05/06/2018 4:19:42 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies ]


To: Disestablishmentarian

I think you may be overlooking the redacted sections of the authorizations. Since the SC claims they are not relevant to the Manafort issues, they could be targeting the HRC campaign.
*************************************************************
Not really. My question pertained to written vs verbal instructions, I assumed that the redacted portions might cover something we’d be happy with or even something we might not like so much.

Redaction was not generic to the issue I was interested in clarifying. I am relieved that a Judge who seems to have some sense will be reviewing it at least. I can wait to hear what the redaction is though I’d like to know right now. LOL


1,166 posted on 05/06/2018 4:34:26 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson