Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rusty0604

Ok, I’ve been reading the back and forth on Sessions and Nunez all day. Here’s what I think. The more friction there “seems” to be between the House/Senate committees and the DOJ the more people’s ears prick up. The liberal media salivates. Twitter world goes nuts. After a week or more of eyes-on the situation the DOJ “caves’, the committees get the info they want. That information makes its way into the national consciousness.

This is all orchestrated brilliantly. If there were no fireworks everyone would still be blue pilled. All of this back and forth is red pilling at its finest.


1,144 posted on 05/06/2018 4:04:21 PM PDT by lighthouse (Enough already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]


To: lighthouse

It’s still building. The DS needs to defend Mueller more before the big reveal of his unredacted mandate.


1,159 posted on 05/06/2018 4:21:00 PM PDT by kallisti (freedom costs a buck-oh-five. funny, but NO: freedom's price is eternal vigilence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies ]

To: lighthouse
-- The more friction there "seems" to be between the House/Senate committees and the DOJ the more people's ears prick up. The liberal media salivates. Twitter world goes nuts. After a week or more of eyes-on the situation the DOJ "caves', the committees get the info they want. --

The dynamic is there, but I think the motives are institutional protection (some justified, some not) rather than a desire to gin up public interest.

There is a good reason that the branches of government compete, check and balance, and are not totally transparent with each other.

Law enforcement has many secrets. So does foreign affairs. The justification for keeping substantial chunks secret is pretty good. The world runs partly on subterfuge, brinkmanship, and secrets. With investigations, assume the FBI was investigating a congressman as a foreign agent. Should Congress have a right to see that? maybe better asked, under what circumstances and when (and who) should see that? Of if a congressman is known to be a conduit for information back to a political party that uses hit-teams to take out political opponents. How much do you share with Schiff? Feinstein?

Think of the rules of the game as though your enemies will use the same rules and have the same powers you propose to give to "your guys."

I've pondered long and hard about how to expose and dispose of the DS players in FBI and DOJ, as well as the plain old opportunist skunks. One hopes that a few strategically places levers, like Horowitz, Huber, and likely a few others in other agencies, will shine daylight on some of the corruption. I see Grassley, Nunes, Goodlatte, and a few others are pushing from the Congressional side too - but I give each branch a bit of slack for institutional protection.

1,167 posted on 05/06/2018 4:34:30 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies ]

To: lighthouse

I certainly hope your assessment is correct.


1,183 posted on 05/06/2018 4:54:10 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies ]

To: lighthouse

This is what I’m hoping as well.


1,192 posted on 05/06/2018 4:59:50 PM PDT by StormFlag (Drain the swamp, but don't forget the disinfectant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies ]

To: lighthouse

I wouldn’t mind at all if you are right. :-)


1,206 posted on 05/06/2018 5:23:49 PM PDT by Rusty0604 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson