you can’t really be this stupid? you’ve never heard of undercover agents replacing explosives with something else?
are you really this ignorant or just too stubborn to admit you’re wrong?
http://fox5sandiego.com/2018/01/04/suspect-indicted-in-thwarted-san-francisco-terror-attack/
Undercover FBI agents posed as ISIS supporters and contacted Jameson. He met with an undercover FBI employee on December 16 and told them he wanted to conduct the attack using weapons and explosives, the complaint said.
Jameson asked the agent for remote timing devices for the pipe bombs and described how to use the devices in the attack, the indictment said.
According to the affidavit, Jameson said Christmas Day “was the perfect day to commit the attack,” which would be styled after the October 31 attack in New York City in which a man killed eight people when he drove a truck down a bike lane, the affidavit said.
Jameson had said he’d just started working as a tow truck driver, which could help in the attack, according to the affidavit. He expressed loyalty to ISIS and its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and offered to donate money and contribute his firearms skills, the affidavit said.
Jameson asked the undercover agents to get him an assault rifle and explosives and sent them photos of what appeared to be Pier 39, the affidavit said.
rofl, the NYC city case had an actual bomb that actually went off (to a limited extent), that is NOTHING like a case of undercover agents either supplying inert materials (so no one actually gets hurt) or arresting the perp when the materials are transferred.
You have zero zero zero evidence that there were any “undercover” agents involved or that the NYC attack was “thwarted”.... the guy had an actual bomb, it’s just that he was an amateur and did not know how to make it effective enough (fortunately).
‘you’ve never heard of undercover agents replacing explosives with something else?’
Here’s the difference. You’ve cited two public reports. When the FBI, or whatever agency, publicizes what they did, then you pretty reliably know it happened.
In the Boston case there is no evidence that anything was involved beyond faulty bomb making. Having Q make a claim is not evidence. Q is an anonymous source that posts on 8chan. That doesn’t come even close to giving Q the bona fides to speak for LE.
Quoting Q does not prove Q. That’s like quoting the Koran to prove Islam. All either of those exercises prove is that the source agrees with itself.