rofl, the NYC city case had an actual bomb that actually went off (to a limited extent), that is NOTHING like a case of undercover agents either supplying inert materials (so no one actually gets hurt) or arresting the perp when the materials are transferred.
You have zero zero zero evidence that there were any “undercover” agents involved or that the NYC attack was “thwarted”.... the guy had an actual bomb, it’s just that he was an amateur and did not know how to make it effective enough (fortunately).
to a “limited extent” LOL you mean it didn’t blow up, it just bunred him kind of like it was spakler instead of a firecracker
hahaha thanks for answering the question, you are that stupid and you are that stubborn LOL
thanks again for the opportunity to prove what a stupid hateful troll you are BYE