[greeneyes]

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3652240/posts?page=46#46

Meant to include you on this post. In case anyone was interested, I did a search and posted one of the articles regarding 5g. It might make sense to someone - I’m not tech savy.

In the interest of better informing those who might be interested, perhaps you would like to provide the scientific data that proves the concern on 5g is unfounded, unscientific hysteria. That would be a really outstanding benefit for everyone.

[TXnMA]

"In the interest of better informing those who might be interested, perhaps you would like to provide the scientific data that proves the concern on 5g is unfounded, unscientific hysteria. That would be a really outstanding benefit for everyone."

Thank you for asking so nicely... :-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The move from 4G to 5G is, first and foremost , a scheme to achieve significantly higher transmitted data rate

Increases in transmitted data rate involve increases in signal frequency

Probably the simplest principle upon which I base my position that moving from 4G to 5G entails reduced physiological risk is that of the well-known and documented "Skin Effect":

Wikipedia: "Skin Effect"

Simply put, the higher the radiative frequency, the more induced currents are confined to the surface of a conductor (you) -- and, the less depth the energy penetrates to cause physiological damage.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BOTTOM LINE: Just because a number is bigger, doesn't, of necessity, make it scarier -- specificially when it is in the denominator of the equations describing the undesired effect.

(Hysterical fear reaction should, similarly, be decreased...)

Inverse proportionality can be a good thing... :-)

FRegards,
TXnMA