Building on this theory... which BTW I think is spot on.
excerpt from Q drop #1287
Cohen raid by FBI?
Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?
SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?
RR signed off?
What other docs were collected?
How many places raided?
Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?
Think logically.
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
Who has everything?
Methods which info collected/ obtained?
Admissible in the court of law?
another excerpt from Q drop #1182
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
again in Q drop #1228
How do we ‘legally’ ……..
Win.
This platform is more than simply pushing the TRUTH.
Q
Notice how legally is bracketed each time... Could Q be saying to us ('legally') is relative in these instances. How has secret data been "injected legally" in the past?
WikiLeaks.... Could JA already have the data but they need the anons to get him the encryption keys?
On October 15, 2017 JA tweeted the code
4767 5774 6a7a 4d6c 6330 666b 314a 3453 0000 0907 84b4 f787 7616 86f7 a737 5707 5736
Could JA have been sending a signal that he's looking for a key in that particular format? It wasn't long after that the Ecuadorians cut off his access to the internet. Coincidence??
Don't know if this is plausible but maybe WL is Q's way of "storing everything offline". And/or if some anon finds the hidden encryption key in the Q drops, JA will ('legally') inject it into the public domain.