Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning; MHGinTN; blu; grey_whiskers; smoky415; Mytruevine; Aquamarine; Cboldt; mairdie; ...
I just still have a ... hunch ... or ... intuition ... that even with Judy Wood and the A & E for 9/11 truth--they did arrive at some useful insights and puzzle pieces that are part of the real picture of the real event.

I too am willing to look at fringe stuff. . . but once they fake their evidence? As Judge Judy says, "Lie to me in one thing, and everything else you say is suspect."

Physicist Judy did do some good work prior to 2004. I scanned through what papers were available. I have to ask myself what happened to her in 2004 that derailed her into the fringes? Perhaps she DID have an insight that caused someone to start paying attention to what she was saying and decide that she needed personal attention short of being disappeared. THERE is where the CIA and MKUltra may have reared it's ugly head. Wood took a distinct turn down a path that made her untouchable. Within two years she lost her professorship and her papers became un-publishable because of her new associations with almost every kooky, fringe idea that came along. That sounds like what they do; hide what they don't want anyone paying attention to in a cacophony of what appears to be similar noise, so much of it that it makes it almost impossible to discern the germ of truth among all that useless and often idiotic noise.

Conversion of a once qualified scientist into a poly-kook, serves two purposes: first, it dissuades those who see the fakers, fringe causes, questionable website links, and other alternative "disciplines" whom the now-pseudo-scientist supports and lends his or her degrees and "gravitas" to, it discourages these researchers from wasting time even looking; and second, it sends those who do take the time to use this person's website and authority, down blind alleys, chasing after red-herrings, and accepting nonsense as factual from these "supported" fakers, fringe causes, questionable website links, and alternative disciplines BECAUSE the "scientist" who once had "gravitas" seems to be, or actually IS, endorsing their conclusions, while many of them may actually have been put in place by the bad-actors themselves.

And, I don't have a super-rationalist need to have everything fit in very tidy little boxes. Life is often messier than that. And all the more so when the oligarchy is probably using every means they can to snooker us whether it be with exotic tech, advanced tech, UFO tech or even satanic supernatural stuff.

I know that the government's UFO research project of the 1960s actively sought to "debunk" sightings of UFOs. . . and now we learned that they actively sent out reports of easily explainable UFO sightings to obfuscate any potential REAL sightings. On October 8, 1967, at about 9:15 PM, I had my own encounter with a true flying saucer.

I was 18 years old, running the publicity for an appearance of Up With People at Hughes Stadium at Sacramento City College for the Sacramento Union Newspaper and Sing Out Sacramento. (The newspaper editor had given me Samuel (Mark Twain) Clemens' old roll top desk to use while I was doing it!)

The UWP stage had been set up on the fifty yard line and I was standing backstage with a Pentax Reflex Camera I'd borrowed from the paper in my hands, trying to get a silhouette view of some of the singers on their risers along with the 8000 members of the audience in the grandstand in the background to be used in the next morning's newspaper. I had the camera lens really opened up wide to get the crowd in color (F1.4, IIRC), as the Sacramento Union had excellent color capability.

As I was standing facing west, thinking about the best angle, and if I would need to move farther back on the field, a disk shaped object reflecting the lights of the city, floated silently from the north, and came to a stop over and behind the crowd. I got the impression that it was slightly rotating as it stayed in place. As I think about it, why I thought it was rotating, it must have had some feature on it that moved which gave that impression. My recollection is that it was a counter-clockwise rotation.

It seemed to me to be about three times the size of a full moon, and if I had to guess, I'd say 150 to 200 feet in diameter, using the buildings which were behind and below it as comparison. It stayed, floating there for perhaps two minutes, and then suddenly shot straight up at high speed and dwindled rapidly out of sight. I'm pretty sure my jaw was on the ground. Not once during the entire episode did I even think that I was standing there WITH A CAMERA IN MY HANDS!

The audience was completely oblivious. But the 70 or so young Up With People performers on stage all saw it. . . and I was to learn the next year when I was at Mackinac College (which is where Up With People was originated before it became a college) that the UFO became Topic A on the tour buses that year. My college roommate, Ollie Howe, had been on stage during that performance and had also seen it.

I did get a great color shot of the crowd and the performers in silhouette. . . but alas, no flying saucer.

2,058 posted on 05/06/2018 1:24:45 PM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2042 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
Very interesting. It is certainly more than plausible that all the stops were pulled out to sucker Judy Wood into a crash and burn track. That is exactly what they have long done.

The UFO sounds fascinating, for sure.

The founder of the university Qx taught at in Taipei was big on UP WITH PEOPLE. I think she was on the Board or some such. Anyway--he did some digging and found out it was an oligarchy front org to influence youth into the oligarchy's globalist values and schemes.

2,059 posted on 05/06/2018 1:35:11 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2058 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker; blu; grey_whiskers; smoky415; Mytruevine; Aquamarine; Cboldt; mairdie; RitaOK; ...
imho, this is one of the better Judy Wood series of videos.

Folks can view the evidence and make up their own minds re Judy Wood and her quality research and explanations--with extemsove clear documentation as well as lots of video evidence. There are examples of 'dustification' of steel in broad daylight. And, she talks about where's the rubble from the two towers etc..

In several of the shots, various steel beams, building components clearly sticking up in the air in broad daylight disintegrate/dustify in full view. I know of no other explanation than Judy's that comes close to explaining that.

There are some other worthwhile videos connected to this one in youtube's usual listing on the right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xDagfiXkJI

2,088 posted on 05/13/2018 7:00:35 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2058 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson