So do i. . . but not Hutchison.
And yes, we/I have a misunderstanding, perhaps. But the plasma you want to be the means to dustify the floors and columns was not present as evidenced by the absence of a pyroclastic cloud at ground level where people were walking away from the collapses being less than 1 block from the towers as the cloud engulfed them.
Don't raise red herrings regarding the Architects and Engineers. It is reasonable to believe they too cannot actually reconcile the disparate evidence. I am convinced a directed energy weapon was used on the Tower complex. If one is not familiar with the effects of one then the clues are invisible, just anomalous data: like the cylindrical holes in buildings not hit by planes (#s 4,5 & 6} that were not caused by 'falling debris; the voids are cored out, with no significant debris pile at the bottom of the cylindrical holes.
The mass of paper which rained down all over the scene is evidence that a plasma did not dustify the floors. The strange (to someone not familiar with the vagaries of directed energy weapons) apparent burn patterns on vehicles not adjacent to the buildings is a huge clue, one which Judy Wood has sought to explain. Huge vertical column steel was literally airborne, taking flight in a manor that compression ejection cannot explain. Large vertical columns can be seen turning to dust, not toppling over. The presence of materials which would have been consumed with a plasma, while materials much more dense are absent in the debris is yet another clue.
I will not go into details on the Internet as to how this is hallmark of a directed energy weapon. But I am convinced one was used / tuned to/upon the tower complex on 911. I will send you more on such weaponry via freepmail, but right now I have domestic conundrums to deal with. Have a good Sunday afternoon.