[MHGinTN]

And you continue to try the alinsky tactics! Cold Fusion? Steven, the CIA's stooge physicist, couldn't have given it a better derisive, dismissive title if he had tried. Your use of that derision exposes you the more.

And just so you see it, that little smear tactic of partial facts regarding Dr Woods associations (some of which she was naïve enough to believe were honest when they were not, and you know that, too) she later repudiated, well that nails your deceptive agenda right there, son.

For the readers of this series of exchanges, two or three of the same agitprops who worked to suppress low energy nuclear reactions are mouthing off on the 911 event, a couple of whom have switched from nano thermite to small nukes and, back again, in their service to divert attention from looking at what actually is in evidence with the videos from 911.

You've no doubt heard of project mockingbird? well, son, the CIA and deep state have done the same seeding for disinformation purposes in the Scientific community. You are starting to look like one of their seeds.

[Swordmaker]

And you continue to try the alinsky tactics! Cold Fusion? Steven, the CIA's stooge physicist, couldn't have given it a better derisive, dismissive title if he had tried. Your use of that derision exposes you the more. . .

(some of which she was naïve enough to believe were honest when they were not, and you know that, too)

Look, Mhg. If Wood has repudiated such "dishonest" things, then she should have REMOVED THEM FROM HER SITE! Don't leave links of her discussions of her supporting them on there SHOWING her support and her arguments for them, and links to their sites on her home page with photos and glowing comments. Don't leave their PAPERS there. Don't link to their YouTubes. I spent quite a bit of time exploring her website to find out what she was all about. I know hogwash when I see it and read it.

Don't leave her support for Hutchison out there FRONT AND CENTER! DELETE All of THEM!

You are defending the indefensible with Dr. Wood. From what I see, she is "have PhD will support" as far as FRINGE sites are concerned. I have very little patience with scientists who prostitute their science in this way. . . and she does.

I have no connection with the government in any way, especially the CIA, MHGinTN. . . and your dishonest accusations are the ALINSKY tactics on this thread. WOOD is in my a narcissistic charlatan. . . one who uses her degree to push pseudo-science as proof of her hobby horse.

I am still open minded on low-energy nuclear phenomena but her inclusion of it along with all the rest of her poppy-cock rankles because she INCLUDED it along with fakers such as Hutchison and smears some well meaning scientists. SHE's the one who paints too broad a swath with her kookiness.

The seeds of Mockingbird are alive and well in non-sensible idiocy like this non-sense.