why wouldn't it?Ping
David’s name was found on a stela over a century ago..............
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesha_Stele
“King David is an ancestor of Jesus”. I don’t think that is right. God was the father of Jesus— Right? Of course Joseph was not in the blood line and there is no reference at all to a blood line from David to Mary. I think this statement is not factual.
Did they locate the old threshing floor?
Some people doubt the existence of David, Moses, etc. (practically any biblical figure), but have no problem believing in the existence of mooHAMed, Alexander the Great, etc....
“Speaking to Breaking Israel News, he said: ‘Until 25 years ago no one doubted that King David was a historical figure.
“’In the last 25 years or so, however, David’s historicity, and especially the size of his kingdom, are hotly debated.”
Last 25 years...Things sure have gone down hill quickly in that time, eh?
I already knew it existed
I think the Bible has been affirmed by archeology so many times that generally, it should be accepted as historical fact unless DISPROVEN. As I see it, it is not a matter of IF it will be proven with archeological finds, but WHEN. And keep in mind, the Muzzies have been trying very hard to destroy such evidence every chance they get.
A great age we live in. Evidence for the grave of the slave Joseph, in Egypt, has also surfaced.
Wow! More Palestinian ruins found in Israel!!
LOL I kill me sometimes.
Yes....
why wouldn't it?