[tsomer]

“Net neutrality?” It’s more like “net neutering.”

It essentially gives the “content providers” like google, streaming services, amazon, etc, tie up limited bandwidth and create bottlenecks that will slow access by smaller entities.

It makes the carriers who maintain the physical infrastructure subservient to the online behemoths and bars them from charging more for the extra data they dump into the pipeline, and removes any incentive to build more bandwidth.

It’s anti-market and will create a shortage.

[rurgan]

" It essentially gives the “content providers” like google, streaming services, amazon, etc, tie up limited bandwidth and create bottlenecks that will slow access by smaller entities.”

Good points. This “net neutrality” allowed facebook, google youtube, twitter etc. to keep out competition better so that they could maintain their monopoly and censor the Internet. This was their plan.It's amazing how many conservatives even on this forum were fooled by the propaganda and lies:
>

With Soros’ net neutrrality: One of the things soros, Obama, and Zuckerberg wanted to do was cripple the ISPs so that Facebook , google etc all marxist companies could censor conservatives more effectively and it was working. No one could complain to the ISPs. Facebook , google , youtube ,amazon,twitter would have a complete monopoly.

Now with net neutrality dead conservatives can build facebook , google, twitter , amazon etc. competing alternatives that don't censor and allow true freedom on the internet something we haven't had since 2015 and allowed facbook , google etc. to keep out competitors.