Posted on 04/20/2018 5:42:51 PM PDT by ransomnote
Do you find yourself hoping to God the covfefe thing is ‘misguided’?
I think Palantir is important - not as P necessarily, but as a company/software - and it’s capability. Just as google, facebook etc. play a part - Since people aren’t familiar with it, I think it would be good to put into the lexicon.
Here’s some more info on P.
Apr 03 2018 20:43:05
Anonymous
884748
>>884736
P = pope?
Apr 03 2018 20:45:50
!xowAT4Z3VQ 884799 >>884748
[Pope] will be having a terrible May.
Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT>
Dark to LIGHT.
TRUTH.
Q
Apr 03 2018 20:49:59 !xowAT4Z3VQ 884858 >>884833
The “Chair” serves the Master.
Who is the Master?
P = C.
Q
I have a Gamo myself. Simple, efficient WTSHTF small game/keep fed tool. Pigeons and doves beware!
Thanks for the laymen’s explanation.
I agree, but only to some extent; and one would have to be well motivated - for istance, doing research on the topic. And even then, one would need to take counter measures; such as mentally or writing down the actual truths to rebut the propaganda and methods.
bookmark
P is clear as mud to me - here’s a Q post.
Apr 03 2018 20:49:59
Q
!xowAT4Z3VQ
884858
>>884833
The “Chair” serves the Master.
Who is the Master?
P = C.
Q
Sounds like the fix was in (again) with this guy. I'm really starting to believe the MK Ultra stuff.
Add another "conspiracy theory" to my kookoobird file. :)
"I'm stepping into the shower" --> you're doing it wrong.
He has the weapons concealed, which really cramps his running style. Especially if one of them is a "long gun."
Relative to your post, I'm ASSUMING that
But there is a limit to how much information can be coded into a sequence of data that is 3 billion units in length.
a context of 3 billion units in length could theoretically hold a huge (though finite) amount of information--as I think a post upthread indicated.
It helps to examine the context leading up to that Q-drop. In context, the most likely interpretation is P=Pope.
In my previous "as long as we are thinking creatively" remark, I threw all context out the window, and just described a random thought that had entered my head.
I’m really starting to believe the MK Ultra stuff
*************************************************************
Just a reminder, that there were hearings establishing that MK ULTRA was real - established fact backed up by a link from Q to those hearings, as well as several reports from You Tube, including one from ABC.
Why wouldn’t you believe in it? It was established as a fact.
Maybe I am misunderstanding your comment?
Very interesting. Was wondering if paint ball games had anything to do with it. Guess not! Sounds like a fun tool, though.
The book of your life isn't the same thing as the book of life.
Rev. 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
Malachi 3:14 Ye have said, It is vain to serve God: and what profit is it that we have kept his ordinance, and that we have walked mournfully before the Lord of hosts?
15 And now we call the proud happy; yea, they that work wickedness are set up; yea, they that tempt God are even delivered.
16 Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another: and the Lord hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord, and that thought upon his name.
17 And they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him.
18 Then shall ye return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not.
If you stack up the ‘Pope’s following to say, Mohammed’s, PaperClip Pope has PaperClip Mohammed beat 2:1.
Indeed. But much of that information is "tied up" in reproducing the living organism, and providing it with the "stuff" that makes it living/sensing.
I find it an interesting academic question, "do all of our experiences cause our DNA to adjust/"record"?" But what does it matter either way, where exactly in our physical embodiment does each experience leave an impression?
Maybe bridge means how they get around 4th Amnd. roadblocks in synthesizing data the donaters dont know about, and conjectural meta-data assumptions.
___________________________
As a non-tech person, I understand the first 11 words. The rest I have a hazy understanding of from assumed context only.
Perhaps Q realized that many of us have not a clue what *synthesizing* means in these contexts and when we read ‘conjectural meta-data assumptions’, our eyes glaze over.
“Bridge’ I understand as a way over &/or between other things/places.
Random thoughts are good. An anon asked if P=Pope, but Q did not confirm. Seemed to duck the answer with P=C. Q confuses me often. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.