Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: More evidence of Deerfield, IL police state: ALL government employees exempt!

Posted on 04/06/2018 9:54:35 PM PDT by lado

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: lado

The masters and the enslaved.


21 posted on 04/07/2018 4:35:16 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks lado

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/deerfield/index


22 posted on 04/07/2018 4:51:30 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lado

The clause “,if the persons described are authorized by a competent authority...” restricts that right.


23 posted on 04/07/2018 5:01:40 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left. PS. f*ck the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

“Communist societies in practice have two classes: working and ruling. Apart from that, everyone is equal....”

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Communism is merely a rebranding of feudalism and feudalism was nothing more that mafia crime at a national government scale.


24 posted on 04/07/2018 5:21:29 AM PDT by WMarshal (Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
The clause “,if the persons described are authorized by a competent authority...” restricts that right.

Read it again. I had to. Pay attention to (i) and (ii).

25 posted on 04/07/2018 5:28:14 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Ping


26 posted on 04/07/2018 5:39:14 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado
So unless I can't read English properly, the bozo down at the Public Works Dept. or the Teachers Union goon can keep theirs.

Read it again. The exceptions are:

The provisions of this section, excluding those pertaining to the manufacture and sale of any assault weapon in the Village, do not apply to (i) any law enforcement officer, agent or employee of any municipality of the State of Illinois

This means it exempts any law enforcement officer, law enforcement agent, or law enforcement employee of any municipality of the state of Illinois.

(ii) any law enforcement officer, agent or employee of the State of Illinois, of the United States, or of any other state

This means it exempts any law enforcement officer, law enforcement agent, or law enforcement employee of the State of Illinois, of the United States (Federal Government), or of any other state (part of LEOSA.)

(iii) any member of the military or other service of any state or the United States, including national guard and reserves,if the persons described are authorized by a competent authority to so carry an assault weapon loaded on a public way and such person is acting within the scope of his duties or training...

If you are issued an assault weapon as part of your duties, and you are authorized to load it, and you are ordered onto a public way by a lawful order from a legitimate chain of command, you are exempted. Bonus: You are also exempted from the requirement to possess an Illinois Firearm Owner ID Card in order to legally possess ammuniton. Double bonus: Most likely that assault rifle you are carrying is a fully automatic firearm and you are also exempted from the prohibition of possessing those as well.

27 posted on 04/07/2018 6:02:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado

They key phrase you are choosing to ignore:

“if the persons described are authorized by a competent authority to so carry an assault weapon loaded on a public way and such person is acting within the scope of his duties or training...”

That big “if” excludes most government employees and further is limited, even with respect to those exempted, to only when “acting within the scope” of their duties. It is, in essence admitting it - the assault weapons ban - does not apply to law enforcement types when such types of persons are acting within their official duties.


28 posted on 04/07/2018 6:09:29 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Gubmint goons “exempt”?.........

Looks like they are planning ahead, knowing when/if total gun ownership is NO MORE, Civil War III will begin. They want to be able to protect themselves from “We, The People”.


29 posted on 04/07/2018 6:43:18 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lado

It will go over like the previous attempts to get folks to register all their weapons with the State(s) - next to zero compliance and a lot of folks citing “Molon Labe” as their code if they try to raid and confiscate the weapons.


30 posted on 04/07/2018 6:47:42 AM PDT by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado

Chitcago is lost just as is Detroit. Sotoreo’s boy still at the helm means hell for all . Get rid of that scumbag and work your way down .


31 posted on 04/07/2018 7:16:31 AM PDT by mythenjoseph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado

You’re taking this one in the wrong context.

1) This particular bit concerns storage.
2) It says it applies only to those “authorized to carry”, meaning cops, etc., not janitors.

Like most government orgs, for those “authorized to carry” storage is typically provided by a quartermaster.


32 posted on 04/07/2018 7:21:31 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado
Only two words come to mind........... Do the letters F O mean anything to you 🙋
33 posted on 04/07/2018 10:53:14 AM PDT by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lado
 
 
Was curious as to the police department's view on things, so had to go take a look -
 
 
 
They're getting beat up pretty good right now, with an occasional moonbat defender thrown in - https://www.facebook.com/DeerfieldPD
 
 
An interesting idea for activism - LoL!! - https://firearmsunknown.com/FU2/blog/post/deerfield-gun-owners-to-turn-in-assault-weapons-at-tyrants-homes
 
 

34 posted on 04/07/2018 12:20:30 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

Thanks for posting.


35 posted on 04/07/2018 1:59:38 PM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

See Christopher E. Greenstein’s comment; very well said!

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1916717248369599&id=461839457190726


36 posted on 04/07/2018 4:05:20 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson