Posted on 04/04/2018 5:56:56 AM PDT by C19fan
Piers Morgan used a series of tweets Monday to call for a ban on all semi-automatic guns and stress his conviction that “no civilian needs one.” His call for a ban on semi-automatic firearms was followed by other tweets in which he told Americans that the Second Amendment was never intended to protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Rather, it was only intended to protect militias members’ ability to be armed.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It’s a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Needs.
The US Constitution authorizes Congress to issue Letters of Marque (to private citizens).
To implement a Letter of Marque, the designated citizen would need to own one or more BATTLESHIPS.
How about that, Piers, ol’ buddy?
ESAD Pierce you cucked Brit faggot.
The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed—where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.
[Silveira v. Lockyer: Judge Alex Kozinski’s Dissenting Opinion]
Come and take them, Limey.
Hell, let’s just bring back the flint lock.
Citizens need them, subjects don’t.
“Only the police should have semi-autos”
Tell it to the people of Sacramento.
Technically, police are “civilians”. As are the private security who protect Piers. Does he support taking away THEIR semi-autos?
A bunch of farmers and rubes with muzzle loaders beat 'em.
Morgan does not understand that “illegal is not synonymous with unavailable”
Piers may be honest but he just doesn’t get it. If anyone shows up to confiscate my guns I’m gonna want all the firepower I can muster.
A double-action revolver is pretty darn close to being “semi-automatic”.
The next step would be banning them as well.
But you have implement the agenda one goose-step at a time. Right, Piers?
There is a reason that they are called Europe-peons. Having lived under an earthly king for generations they cannot comprehend the freedom granted by a Living God in Christ Jesus.
Sadly, many of our own countrymen have denied God and embraced an earthly life. But the core of this country is faith not in man, but in the Creator of man. And the right to bear weapons is as the Constitution says not granted by other men, but by the Creator of man.
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness, all come with your first breath in this land. Men who would make themselves gods, claim others freedom to lift themselves above the crowd, but here, the crowd has the freedom to resist them.
Totalitarian dictatorship is a bit more difficult to achieve here.
Semi-automatics are ordinary guns. It’s the vision thing that people have....they don’t look like muskets...
The Brits ban carrying of knives in public, but not acid, though acid attacks are on a meteoric rise there.
Like any Brit, Morgan has no credibility on the “who needs what firearm” issue.
I got a better idea. Ban Piers Morgan.
5.56mm
And stupid.
But his snarky accent make him seem smart to lefties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.