Posted on 04/02/2018 5:44:07 PM PDT by ransomnote
John Wilkes Booth and company following Lincoln assassination. Treason was not specified I believe, but conspiracy was. The current imbroglio fits the same description without the presidential death.
Anons et al are saying AAA stands for Awan arrest in April. (Those are the words that have the As in them.
Back in Jan before the SOTU some anons were joking on a thread over on the 8chan that Trump should work in the phrase “tip top” into the address. Another anon added “tippy top”.
They wanted it in so Trump would be acknowledging that Q and company existed. He didn’t say it in the SOTU but he did say it at the Easter egg roll yesterday, standing next to a white rabbit.
Or that the Apocalypse is at hand.
I think Q’s talking about sealed indictments.
What is going on in that last picture? Do you have any details on who, when, what?
It looks like people praying for our President and laying on of hands. Yes?
“The resignation and reappointment was meant to erase the Obama stigma/stench from Huber.”
Several anons have suggested that since O was found to be ineligible, they had to re-confirm him - bwahaha!
I mean they have to check their craft before they take off, so the sabotage would have to be on a timer or something.
There was some debate over the use of military tribunals, and AG James Speed prepared an opinion on the subject.
At the time of the assassination a civil war as flagrant, the city of Washington was defended by fortifications regularly and constantly manned, the principal police of the city was by Federal soldiers, the public offices and property in the city were all guarded by soldiers, and the President's House and person were, or should have been, under the guard of soldiers. Martial law had been declared in the District of Columbia, but the civil courts were open and held their regular sessions, and transacted business as in times of peace.Such being the facts, the question is one of great importance-- important, because it involves the constitutional guarantees thrown about the rights of the citizen, and because the security of the army and the government in time of war is involved; important, as it involves a seeming conflict between the laws of peace and of war.
Having given the question propounded the patient and earnest consideration its magnitude and importance require, I will proceed to give the reasons why I am of the opinion that the conspirators not only may but ought to be tried by a military tribunal.
Still cracks me up every time I think about it!
Bwahahahaa! Indeed! :)
If it breaks as advertised, a 21st century version of those conditions will be realized. As well as the upwelling desire for the scales of justice to be balanced. The perps won’t be seen as sympathetic when the rest of their history is laid bare.
U-1 crimes in Utah maybe?
What people are missing about this whole Utah thing is it’s just a data center there. You don’t walk into a data center and delete emails, you do it from wherever you are in the world.
If the data was stored on a cloud, where would you hold a trial?
Utah is just a place Huber happens to be from, nothing more, nothing less.
John Wilkes Booth, maybe?
...bourne...
_____________________
Didn’t Q reference the Bourne Trilogy films?
Not a common misspelling, IMO. I could see *borne* as a typo, but not *bourne*.
“As much as I would like to see it, I still have a hard time believing that any ex-president will ever be charged with anything just for the fact it might destabilize the US. “
That has always been the way it has been played however: one could argue that the state has already been destabilized by the corruption and criminality; it is time to let the chips fall where they may.
I hope you are right. The DEMs appear to be immune to facts and reason, being driven purely by an intention to gain power and control or eradicate their opposition.
In the "Booth case," the state of war was precedent to the assassination; and it was the state of war that justified resort to military tribunal for citizens, while civilian courts were open. I don't see that fact pattern with U1 or framing the elected president with known false charges.
No harm, no foul, TXnMA. Just being a pedant for the sake of the thread.
This!
It was, AFAIK, just a single tweet by someone named Flores. Didn’t see anything about a left-hand turn to Baja, just that Mexico will stop them and offer humanitarian visas to *the vulnerable*, which did not sound like Mexican SOP, to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.