Posted on 04/02/2018 5:44:07 PM PDT by ransomnote
As long as we are nit-picking.
About half the US Atoorneys resigned when Trump was sworn in.
AG Sessions was himself appointed in Feb. March 10, he requests resignation letters from 46 USA, including Huber. Within a week, Huber is named interim USA by Sessions, under the Vacancise Reform Act. This designation is good for 120 days.
Trump nominated Huber for USA/Utah on June 15, 2017. . Huber was confirmed by the Senate on a voice vote on August 3.
Senate confirms Huber as U.S. attorney for Utah, returning him to old job
As long as we are nit-picking.
About half the US Atoorneys resigned when Trump was sworn in.
AG Sessions was himself appointed in Feb. March 10, he requests resignation letters from 46 USA, including Huber. Within a week, Huber is named interim USA by Sessions, under the Vacancise Reform Act. This designation is good for 120 days.
Trump nominated Huber for USA/Utah on June 15, 2017. PN612 - Nomination of John W. Huber for Department of Justice, 115th Congress (2017-2018). Huber was confirmed by the Senate on a voice vote on August 3.
Senate confirms Huber as U.S. attorney for Utah, returning him to old job
ThankQ. Ha Ha. Just announced on Fox. DJT approval now @ 50% - better than Obama @ 46% @ same point in time - DEM Bulb of course is disputing the poll etc. etc.
Sec T. Trump?
Mexico Says It Will Disband Caravan, Let Migrants Apply For Permits To Stay
Gee that didnt take all that long, they never even got close to the US border.
____________________
One source only.
Not what is being put forward from MSM.
And, if I read that one source correctly, the permits are only being offerred or said to be offerred to the “most vulnerable”.
Does not sound like Mexico.
If proximity to the crime scene is pertinent, then Cayman financial crimes could be conveniently tried in Gitmo.
Can I ask WHY do folks on the interwebz (NIKK included) copy and paste a tweet and then reprint the entire tweet as the body of the thread (or, vice versa)?
Some tweets just aren’t good enough to post twice, ne c’est pas?
Too funny.
Of course, And venue can be hotly litigated. Courts can also remove cases from one jurisdiction to another, and defendants have the right to ask for removal, on many different rationales, including convenience.
The set of NSA civil cases, some 20 of them, were consolidated and removed to Federal court in San Francisco, for example. Plaintiffs from Maine, to Washington State, to Indiana, and 15 or so other states. Not removed to Utah, where the data was all directed.
I think cause not everybody can access twitter to see it in it’s original form? I myself, like to see it printed out for convenience with a backup in twitter land for verification. Maybe? See voo play?
NTSB Accident Report PDF
NTSB Accident Report HTML
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the captain's inappropriate response to the activation of the stick shaker, which led to an aerodynamic stall from which the airplane did not recover. Contributing to the accident were (1) the flight crew's failure to monitor airspeed in relation to the rising position of the lowspeed cue, (2) the flight crew's failure to adhere to sterile cockpit procedures, (3) the captain's failure to effectively manage the flight, and (4) Colgan Air's inadequate procedures for airspeed selection and management during approaches in icing conditions.
That’s what I was thinking, venue is almost 100% negotiable, unless it’s a tribunal.
The aircraft fought the pilot.
Is that not strange?
Wake up.
There are no coincidences .
Okay, I got unlazy for a second;
9-11.121 - Venue Limitations
A case should not be presented to a grand jury in a district unless venue for the offense lies in that district.
The difference between "should" and "shall," and "may," are very important in lawyer-speak.
Courts have the last word, defendants generally have more say so than plaintiff or prosecutor. Manafort is arguing venue, for example, because Mueller has charged him in two different venues.
In my world, that is not literally true 100% of the time, unless one decides to go off on some metaphysical plane.
Yes I am one of those who may laugh at a funeral!
Ain’t it grand!
I don't mind if you think YOU can get hauled off to Utah, or New Jersey of Alabama, at the prosecution whim of maximizing incovenience to you, or minimizing it to them, but fact of the matter is, you have a constitutional right to be tried WHERE the crime was commited, and if YOU commited it, you more or less picked your venue.
If a USA bring a GJ in the wrong venue, it ends up being waste, so from a department eficiency standpoint, he should convene GJ were the case is going to be tried, etc. It's not illegal if he convenes a GJ elsewhere. Knock himself out in Alaska or Hawaii for all the court cares.
Ah the old days! Denny's after a night out. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.