Posted on 04/02/2018 5:44:07 PM PDT by ransomnote
Thank you for these threads. One thing I am stuck on is the reference date timestamp of 2.12.09. I believe in this format it is read Dec. 02, 2009 and not what everyone ran with and Q just commented “The timestamp is key.” to a question from an anon as to whether this was about Bev Eckert.
What did happen on Dec. 02, 2009?
Maybe it was this... very bad...
...that Q is pointing us to.
Just a thought of mine for a while now but after post 985 I’m more convinced than ever. Would make a great Q card.
SS1
Thank you so much!! yes I am dense about some things ;-)
I think the notion of a reboot because Obama is going to be shown unqualified is reasonable, "for the history books." A US Attorney reaching the level of "for the history books" on account of being held over or renominated is not a significant historical event.
LOL
Battles of Lexington and Concord. Shot heard around the world. British had told us to hand over our guns.
GOOOD point! We need to be very vigilant on that day and the surrounding days.
Maybe we need to beat up on that snarky Cboldt guy. ;-)
I agree with you TX.
Trump clearly said during the debates that she should be locked up.
And one of the most important problems with the SWAMP is that they have been immune from the law. So the whole point of this swamp draining is to show everyone that the law applies equally to all.
WWG1WGA: Where We Go One, We Go All.
Mexico has a hideous reputation for abusing illegal immigrants. Central Americans enterring Mexico can expect to be robbed, beaten, raped etc. and often that’s by the police. Mexico does have immigration laws just like the US. They have those laws to prevent South Americans from entering their country in order to find work or improve their quality of living. It’s only the US that is portrayed as monstrous for having immigration laws and limits.
There’s a chance nothing but thieves will be at the appointed stops in Mexico for this “caravan” unless maybe the Mexican president wants to support them (protect them).
But a pardon is within his power, it would be according to the law.
Whether or not Hillary would be disgraced would be for history. But if she is tried, THAT event would preoccupy the country to the exclusion of MAGA, and his opponents in Congress would do all they could to blow up his agenda. Pardon her, and the political dynamic takes a radical shift.
Maybe Q is implying it is (One for the) History books as the old saying goes. If that is the case, then there is some big history coming our way as we hope it plays out.
CGato
One more point. If HRC’s crimes are as heinous as many of us believe them to be, there is no sane person who would want her to be pardoned.
Good Night! It’ll all be OK
OH man you are bumming me out. Just a couple of charges of treason shouldn’t take all that long! Jail for life in exchange for admitting guilt to the rest.
I knew you would figure it out on your own, and saw an opportunity for whimsey.
I’ll be lurking on these Q threads from now on, so as not to stop the flow of research and people who actually can contribute to the discussion....
No worries. There isn't a LEO in America -- who wants to go home to his family -- AND can count on his fingers -- who doesn't understand the odds that say that confiscation is certain LEO suicide...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.