To: Alberta's Child
5 posted on
04/01/2018 9:48:39 AM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Drango
Well, there was something special about His burial cloth to be repeatedly emphasized in scriptureand also made people believe instantly.
Gospel Jn 20:1-9
On the first day of the week, Mary of Magdala came to the tomb early in the morning, while it was still dark, and saw the stone removed from the tomb. So she ran and went to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and told them, "They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and we don't know where they put him." So Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb. They both ran, but the other disciple ran faster than Peter and arrived at the tomb first; he bent down and saw the burial cloths there, but did not go in. When Simon Peter arrived after him, he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths there, and the cloth that had covered his head, not with the burial cloths but rolled up in a separate place. Then the other disciple also went in, the one who had arrived at the tomb first, and he saw and believed. For they did not yet understand the Scripture that he had to rise from the dead.
To: Drango
True. Actually, there’s probably nothing that would ever constitute “evidence” along those lines anyway.
17 posted on
04/01/2018 10:19:14 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
To: Drango
Remember: Any headline that ends with a question mark means the answer to the question is “No”.
19 posted on
04/01/2018 10:34:44 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(I'm tired of living in the kinder gentler soviet union.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson