Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jamestown1630

Picasso is best understood in that he is the father of Cubism.

His paintings look weird b/c he looked at a subject and painted it in three dimensions (cubism) on a flat canvas.

Picasso discarded all attempts at sentimentality and romanticism.

It’s not what’s on the canvas so much as it is ones brain working at Mach One speed to figure it all out.

Not the relaxing feeling of looking at a simple still life......or a lovely girl on a swing as a romantic like Watteau painted.


149 posted on 04/06/2018 6:34:41 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Liz
Well, I respect your opinion. But I don't think that Picasso's painting has really touched people and made a "difference" in the way that many realistic painters and their works have done.

(Professional critics and super-sophisticated 'art cognoscenti' aside ;-)

Here's a great painting; you can feel the wind and the cold, and identify with the people and their effort.

Which grabs the attention and the heart more?


150 posted on 04/06/2018 7:02:41 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson