Q Anon: (3/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/22/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

[bagster]

Hahahaha. I'm gonna use that line next trip to the Eye Dr.

They don't get it, but I don't care. I live to amuse myself. :)

[JockoManning]

I agree.

Just trying to keep the faith that POTUS TRUMP'S priorities at heart are our's too and that he has a plan to redeem the hideous parts of this bill one way or another. He's not exactly a wimpy push-over about his priorities--though he may feint now and then, imho.

[No_Doll_i]

Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.[1][2]

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term owes its origin to the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gas Light and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary

[Steven W.]

[JockoManning]

Oh, right ... thanks ...

As in say ... a family--say father and teen kids conspiring to say things askew from the reality the mother perceives in order to get her committed and out of their hair?

But what does that have to do with gas lights?

[JockoManning]

They have something to do with gaslighting or nit-picking?

[bagster]

Wikipedia:

Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target's belief.

The term owes its origin to the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gas Light and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary.[5][6]

[No_Doll_i]

Interesting, they have any theories about it over there?

[JockoManning]

Ahhhh. That explains it. Thanks big.

[bagster]

What exactly is a “nit” and why do people pick them anyway?

[saywhatagain]

Thank you for support, That was a silly unforced error. Specially after the heads up. I tried dulicating from JA's thread how I got to the other thread, still don't know how it happened. Live and learn.

From a satire point, yeah that was excellent.

Reading about the spending bill . . . absolutely depressing. Some one commented and said . . . when your opponents are cheering, you are losing!

Many many of the anons will walk away from Q if POTUS signs. There is nothing good about his bill from what I am hearing so far.

[No_Doll_i]

Ask Cboldt, he is the expert! LoL

[JockoManning]

Thanks.
Nice that it didn’t have anything to do with uhhh strange activities between men.

[JockoManning]

tiny bugs ... e.g. like monkeys pick off each other.

IIRC.

[No_Doll_i]

Maybe it is just a gambit, part of the game to out as many RINOs as possible. Dunno. I think it sucks if he signs it but others say it is only for 6 months and a lot can change in 6 months.
I just don’t see how it fits in the plan, however, since we really don’t know what the plan is, it’s hard to say.

[RitaOK]

Assange is loaded for bear! Joseph Mudsup?? (Sp) Great twitter page full of fascinating riddles, links and news.

Assange believes this JM guy is “odd”, connection wise I presume.

[sargon]

Now that there post was a morale booster, if I've ever seen one!

And if it ain't true, it damn well oughtta be.

Thanks...

[sargon]

Yeah. Quite disappointing. Praying POTUS TRUMP has an end run planned to right the wrongs at some near future point in this very flawed bill.

Hey man—in the grand scale of things, this bill doesn't really mean jack sh-t if your post #129 is accurate.

let's keep our eye on the ball—like the SEAL teams hopefully are—and let the Dems and GOPe worry about the Bread and Circuses.

I wouldn't care if President Trump signed a spending bill TEN TIMES larger than this piece of garbage, if it meant that the Deep State, Hillary et al all get their long overdue comeuppance. That's my focus. Everything else is reeking horse sh-t compared to that...

[No_Doll_i]

Wow, it seems like little hogg boy is off his meds.

David Hogg attacked pro-gun politicians and the NRA, saying, “It just makes me think what sick f***ers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected.”

“What type of s***ty person does that?” Hogg continued. “They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs.”

Hogg said he is going to make sure that “those f***ers aren’t getting reelected.”

[STARLIT]

Ingrid Bergman is married to Charles Boyer and he tries to make her think she’s going crazy. Joseph Cotten of Scotland Yard sneaks into her house while husband is up in attic, and the gaslights flicker and Cotten confirms they did. This restores Ingrid’s sanity.