I’m reading and re-reading your responses to my post #928.
I want to thank you all for your thoughtful replies. (That includes “Thinking about your question.”)
I love FR for the thoughtful and logical comments and input we share. (Even though sometimes I can be a knee-jerk conservative.)
I liked truthluva post #934 pointing out a few holes in the theories. And agreed that despite some flaws it makes sense overall. (If I tell you 100 things and 3 turn out to be wrong, that doesn’t necessarily mean the other 97 are wrong. Or even intentional lies. It could be that I just had bad info or misunderstood about the 3 things. Or I could even be lying about the 3 - for whatever reason, but still telling the truth about 97.)
MNDude #936. I’m inclined to agree about Deep State reaction, yet considering the possibility that that is just part of the multi-level game.
AAG # 942. Agree. He seems far less “groomed and owned.”
JM #959: “Even if we and he fail—it’s still the best game in town and certainly deserves to be played out to the end with as much good faith as possible.” Great point and one I am running with until and unless there is compelling info to do otherwise.
Califreak #1031. You mentioned that it was far more focused on Bush corruption, not enough about Clinton. My initial take on that is this.
1. The Bush family are more important players. More the movers and shakers pulling strings. The Clintons are more on the wannabe end of the situation, although they seem to have moved way up in the ranks.
2. We all have biases. That includes the guy who made the video. So maybe he is more of a “classic liberal” and more anti-Bush focused. Or anti-monarchy, being that he’s British. That could tilt his coverage. Also, it was over 3 hours long! Cuts had to be made somewhere.
3. The video is a couple of years old. Maybe there was a little less info available at that time. Certainly the HRC campaign stuff had not yet happened.
reformed liberal #1035. still digesting a lot of your post. Interesting point: “The stories of the JFK assassination show people who are not smart.” I agree. I don’t think any of them are smart. Clintons: stupid. Bushes: stupid. 0vomits: extra dose of stupid. But what they have is audacity. (as 0vomit reminds us in “his” book title). Great points about keeping Kennedy contained.
The “chaos” of the Trump administration actually has become a point of hope for me. It tells me that either he is not part of the Cabal and so is constantly evaluating and re-evaluating who he can trust. Or worst case which would be just as bad as having a Cabal member in the WH is that he is just another evil faction. Like mafia bosses fighting for turf against each other. I’m going with the former. I’m an optimist. The realist in me is forced to consider all possibilities, not to blindly go with the rosy scenario. But at some point, one has to make a choice. I choose optimism.
God bless you, fellow patriots! Many thanks.
Finally decided, that anything is possible. Hopefully PDJT really is a good guy. Time will tell. I once thought the Bushes were stand up. So.... A little gun shy!