[Cboldt]

-- But in the nuclear age, they risk massive destruction of things they might prefer to preserve. Or not? Who knows? --

Long term damage to nature would be insignificant, IMO. Some spots unliveable for maybe 50 years. See Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Are people living there?

[ichabod1]

I definitely think the US would have provoked war with Russia & Iran in furtherance of Agenda 21 to reduce population. I could be wrong about that though. War is not the most effective way to reduce population. Famine works much better, and you can see it being applied wherever communism takes over such as the South Africa and the Venezuela and the Rhodesia.

[generally]

We have vastly different nukes today. Also, are these Cabal people planning to live more than 50 years? Most of them are old already.

I’m not trying to disagree/argue. Just discuss.

Best,
g

[Keyhopper]

Then we need to deliver a strike package right to their underground bunker. We go, you go too. Scorched earth policy! No one will survive. Hey, but look at the bright side, Nature will thrive 😁