You’ve been in D.C. so long that you can’t see the forest for the trees. The Administrative or Regulatory State are a huge collection of agencies that “regulate” (ie. make law apart from Congress, the ONLY lawmaking branch the Constitution allows) that are basically unaccountable to the people of the United States because they do not directly report to any of the three accountable constitutional branches.
http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2012/pdf/sr116.pdf
I am not able to open the link. Can you send a reputable source that defines what you are talking about?
Are you saying that US Code is unlawful because it isn't part of Constitution? Or the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), or the US Government Manual? The IRS? I don't know what you are talking about, but if you give me an address, I will be happy to go downtown and kick the door open and inquire as to where they derive their constitutional authority.
But I think it is intuitive the US government cannot be operated solely by the Constitution. There has to be administration. Are you saying there should not be administration to implement laws?
You do realize that whatever the manner of administration is adopted, there has to be congressional oversight to ensure compliance with the Constitution and public law? If that doesn't happen (which it does not because the citizenry doesn't demand it), then everything is up for grabs.
The citizenry MUST elect officials that follow the Constitution by using sound hermeneutics of original intent. Absent that, they should not expect anything different than what we have today. The NSA is constitutional because the federal government created it as a means to defend the nation, and Congress has been an advocate for its existence because they cut the check every year when the NDAA is signed.