And you just changed the entire premise for your argument. No longer is the Constitution in view, it is a subjective opinion there are too many agencies and centers that comprise the IC.
Well friend, if we would’ve correctly identified Islam as being incompatible with the US, and the basis by which we were attacked, perhaps things would be different. As it stands, we are a morally bankrupt and cowardly country afraid to face truth.
The US Constitution cannot protect its citizens against such. You are asking too much.
The Administrative [Regulatory] System is spectacularly unconstitutional. If the NSA is part of it, then the NSA is not constitutionally supported.
I began by questioning the constitutionality of the NSA regardless of who it really reports to. So, no, I haven’t changed my argument.
I continue to question why the CIA has not/cannot assimilate the technology the NSA uses.
As far as Islam goes, that too is primarily as question of law. Shari Law is prima facia unconstitutional and is thus illegal and void in the U.S. To the degree Islam requires Shiria Law, Islam cannot be supported in the U.S.
I’m talking most in terms of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended as the legal basis to force the shut down of the unconstitutional 80% portion of the federal government.
And I’m saying that if somehow the NSA is found technically constitutional because it is not part of the rogue Administrate State, then I’m saying the NSA should be shutdown (after it’s technology is assimilated by the CIA) because it is “security” overkill like the Nazis who had the Gestapo and the SS along with their military intelligence and command. Security overkill is when a government, like ours, begins to prioritize not defending America and Americas against her enemies, but “defending” ITSELF against its citizens, like Obama did.
Amen. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.