Posted on 03/12/2018 4:38:43 AM PDT by blueyon
After 24 years any mystery surrounding the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is over ... because O.J. Simpson confessed.
Fox aired "O.J. Simpson: The Lost Confession?" Sunday night and Simpson walked author Judith Regan through what happened on June 12, 1994. He starts out adamant -- he was just talking hypothetically, which is weird, because if he didn't do it what's his basis for creating the hypothetical.
Simpson starts by talking about his "friend Charlie" ... whom he says for some reason went to Nicole's to snoop around. He says Charlie came over to Simpson's home, told him what was going on and Simpson responded, "Whatever is going on it's gotta stop!" Unfortunately, Regan didn't ask Simpson what Charlie said was going on.
Simpson says, hypothetically, he and Charlie drove to Nicole's with a cap, gloves and a knife under the seat and parked in the alley. Simpson says he walked around the property and Ron Goldman appeared, saying he was at the restaurant where Nicole dined and was returning the sunglasses her mom left behind.
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
No one would have believed it. Today, anything is believable.
It was the start of Black Privilege.
Look at Kardashian's face. He was the only one not cheering. He knew he'd just help free a murderer or at least a coconspirator (OJ covering for Jason). He turned six shades of green and ended their friendship.
Of course, he played a huge role and couldn't extract himself from the defense team after disappearing the garment bag that some claim was full of evidence.
He died of cancer 8 years later and then his wife married a tranny and his kids turned out to be sluts (even the son). Hope he's turning in his grave.
That’s the worst thing of all, no thanks to this trial, we got stuck with the Kardashian sluts.
That network had this for a dozen years during a later trial for other crimes, sentencing and parole hearings and they just sat on it.
Great citizens all about open information and getting the News out.
>>The lone white jurist
There were 2 whites and 1 hispanic.
Philip Vannatter was such a moron. Never believed a word he said.
Fuhrman described this dynamic in detail. He was disappointed they would not stay on the case after doing the initial footwork, but he was professional about it and did his job if his account and that of his boss are to be believed.
He went out of his way to mention the bloody thumb print and said it in his notes too.
Any competent detective would have zeroed in on that thumbprint as the first order of business. It sounded like Vannatter just put the handwritten notes in a folder and didn’t read through them again.
Yes, Robert Kardashian. See him with the garment bag at my #83. IIRC, there was chanting outside the courthouse at him, “Where’s the bag!”
The whole Bronco chase and trial was one of those where “were you at” times like JFK’s assassination. We had just remodeled the house and I was in the process of getting the house in order so had the tv on in the background during the trial.
Correct.
In addition they don’t care if other Blacks are killed.
“Better them than me” attitude
Before the trial and the black jury covering for the black dude, the black community complained OJ was Uncle Tom and too white.
One of the greatest moments in TV History....
"And I see O.J. man.....and he looks scared!.....And Baba Booey to y'all!"
> He [Fuhrman] was targeted to play the race card, plain and simple. <
Oh yes, no doubt about it. My point is that Fuhrman made it oh so easy for them to do that. On the stand during the Simpson trial, Fuhrman denied having used the n-word in the past 10 years. Then the defense produced recent tapes on which Fuhrman used the n-word 40 times. No black juror - or any juror - is going to ignore that.
Fuhrman was (at that time, at least) either a racist and a dirty cop, or a lying braggart.
From the link below (it references transcripts from the actual tapes):
The “Fuhrman Tapes” contain eighteen examples of Detective Fuhrman admitting participation in police misconduct, or offering approving comments with respect to misconduct. This misconduct includes illegal use of deadly force, beating suspects to extract confessions, planting evidence, framing innocent persons, and lying or covering up misconduct by others.
http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/Info/fuhrman.html
“My point is that Fuhrman made it oh so easy for them to do that.”
Exactly——I remember at the same wondering why he just didn’t say that he couldn’t recall saying it.
.
Point is, there was a reason they asked that question with a specific time frame of 10 years. That was no accident. They were setting him up, no doubt.
In the Mark Fuhrman planted the glove theory, who killed Nicole and why? She was stabbed multiple times and her head almost severed. How did someone else develop that kind of passion against her? Nothing was taken from the house.
Charlie is like the blue horse my daughter used to tell me came in and put the peanut butter on the couch or dipped all the dolls into red paint.
Did the goldmans get some $ from its airing?
Oh wow, I had forgotten all that. So he was a racist after all. (Fuhrman)
I know. That was patently obvious to anyone.
But...he got off. That told the rest of us something, too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.