Mara for reply in morning. Gotta watch a fishing video before I go nuts.
This comment caused me to connect a dot. Do you remember the Mr Limpet program from the sixties? A man turned into a fish with glasses and was used to track enemy subs. Maybe they have reinstituted this program to track down that rogue Argentinian submarine?
(Mr. Limpett...chuckle. Don Knotts played a better DoD fish than Isreal played a LEO)
First, thanks Swordmaker for the explanations after this post (#1055).
Bagster, here is my concern. Q appears to be repeating things: “expand your thinking”; “who leaked (agency info) to WL?”. I ask why repeat it? Is it important or his Q asking for us to come to a different answer after expanding our thinking?
I treat this not as a puzzle or something to be solved. I see it as “messages from the front”, the theater of action, as it were. We have more than we know (another repetition).
I worry that, at times, the gathered skim over the foundational pieces of the drop so as to get to the puzzling parts (initials, numbers, kill-box meanings) and decipher them. All well and good but, might we be missing something by reverting to standard answers to the first part after being reminded to ^expand^ our thinking?
Now, get on with yo’ bad seff!