Look..if getting people to obtain a voter ID in trade for kids having to be 21 to own a semi automatic weapon...I’ll do that trade in a heart beat. We’re talking increasing the age..that’s it...Sheesh!
“Sheesh!”
I’m just trying to explore your thinking, I didn’t mean to hit a nerve.
From your words and various posts I take it that you are not a “Shall not be infringed” kind of person. So what’s your thinking? I doubt your thinking is that “the right of the people” does not apply to those under a certain age because they are not people. Yet you think that “the right of the people” does not apply to those people. Why?
Do you think that “The right of the people to keep and bear arms” has boundaries like “the right of the people to vote” and that laws regarding things outside those boundaries are not infringements? If so, what, where and why are those boundaries?
The boundaries on “the right of the people to vote” are clear, at least some of them. One has to be a resident of the district in which a public vote takes place. One has to be a member of the organization in which a private vote takes place. And it seems to me the reasons for those boundaries are self evident.
Your thoughts?