I know you think you are smart, but you have very serious reading comprehension problems. It is SUNDANCE who claimed multiple points of “corroboration” not ME. I was pointing out that, so far as I have seen, Sundance has not published such “corroboration”... suggestive details, yes, but not what could be regarded as EVIDENCE that Priestap is cooperating under some kind of “deal” with prosecutors.
As for the “Q” b.s., that is just LARPing for the mentally challenged. I’m sorry that you are so taken in by that. There may be a lot of good nuggets there (because anyone can assemble some of the publicly available facts and make some plausible speculations), but not because the “Q” author is any kind of super-duper secret US govt official at the head of a group of Great Patriots buried in the DEEP STATE. He is a young anonymous blogger who sucks in the gullible.
I got A's and B's and maybe a C or two.
p.s. Sessions is on it. Read between the lines of the article. You're smart.