I got A's and B's and maybe a C or two.
p.s. Sessions is on it. Read between the lines of the article. You're smart.
I was commenting specifically on the topic of corroboration and evidence. Sundance said there are several sources of “corroboration” and you mocked me for saying we have not seen such corroboration before the public. I can be patient, I am not expecting investigators to reveal anything prematurely, so long as they get there in the end. But some, such as Sundance (and you), like to leap ahead of available evidence. I can “read between lines” quite well, thank you, but all that is still SPECULATION (however tantalizing) until it is really nailed down with corroborating evidence. Which, to date, we have not seen.