Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
Once again I feel your well-intentioned posting of outlandish assertions outside the Q area is undermining the credibility of Q and other bona fide sources by mixing in disinformation.
Having said that, I appreciate your carrying the torch for Q on FR, as it definitely helps me keep up with this worldwide phenomenon towards which I can devote only limited time. (Same for Bagster, Ransom, Steve etc.)
I am just suggesting to think twice, maybe three times, before adding extracurricular material of a highly speculative sort to threads which are already under attack.
It just adds fodder.
Yay!
Thank you both for your help.
Well done! You have just acquired The Power of the Link!
Somebody pointed that event out recently, and I think you're right. They walked down to show solidarity and to say, in a way, "You mess with him, you mess with us!". Very significant because it shows that the military is solid with the constitutionally-elected President and because they knew maybe what was planned.
Held together by a strong stem.
Another gung fu style in an already formidable gung fu.
I remember that vividly. At the time, people said someone made a mistake. But your point is rather breathtaking, when we’ve been talking about the support he’s gotten from the military.
I watched it again. It was as if they saw a threat and showed up, then the one guy comes out of the back room and tells them “all clear” and they all leave. Like a threat existed, then was neutralized. Which is highly possible.
All caught up.
I’m forced to listen to the olympics as my wife is watching. I find it creepy how the CBC is fawning all over North Korea...
I have a theory that I would like to advance. Priestap was a career FBI officer. Although he was head of counter-intelligence, he may not actually have been involved in the Trump coup.
Here is how this could have happened. A high-level sensitive counter-intelligence operation like this one would be a code-named special access program (SAP) into which a limited number of individuals would have been "read." There is no reason that Comey cannot run such an op with his choice of CI staff and not read Priestap in. Position is no grounds for access to a special access program and in fact, using position to demand access to a SAP is grounds for termination of such a clearance and dismissal.
It may be the case not only that Priestap is singing, but also that he is not actually turned and singing, but now read into a new SAP and actively involved in the investigation - doing his job. And the payoff to his wife was just a - hey we like your work, don't make too much fuss - as Kipling wrote "Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie. Watch the wall my darling while the Gentlemen go by" instead of a quid pro quo.
After all, why would a career FBI agent betray his country. There is at least a 50% change that he never did and that is why he is still in position as chief counter-intelligence officer. He would have been the first to know that Comey threw him under the bus for an op that he wasn't even in on.
That would make anyone run to OIG and "sing" if that is what you call doing your job and filing a complaint.
Don't worry TrueFact. Any humility you may see from me is completely false. I'm quite arrogant in real life.
:)
I’m glad you’re out there! And don’t worry...I figured that out long ago. I was just poking the tiger a little.
Bfl
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.