Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning

You need to if you want to have a supportable argument for the constitutionality of military tribunals. Otherwise you’re just spouting off assertions with no intention of offering support for what you say which lowers your credibility here IMO.


140 posted on 02/10/2018 10:26:02 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

There is support.
Congressfolks can be arrested for felonies, although
when not at work or on the way.
They are not immune.

And OBozo is not POTUS.
Was not even eligible and ran on someone else’s SS#.

This is sedition and treason, and they are
answerable to MI tribunal pursuant EO.


151 posted on 02/10/2018 11:29:34 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216

I have whatever influence I have with whatever readers think I’m worth reading. The rest can go suck rocks or chase ducks. I’ve found that reputation can be as fickle as people.


157 posted on 02/10/2018 12:03:41 PM PST by JockoManning (to cpy/paste if want: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Haiku-For-The-End-Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson