[Fantasywriter]

I have a tendency to forget how thin-skinned and prickly the Q-believers are. Personally, I found the discussion re whether Q is Alex Jones or Bannon very interesting and thought-provoking. I should have realized that mentioning it on the Q-worshipping thread would cause a backlash. It must not be considered sufficiently reverential.

[bagster]

I should have realized that mentioning it on the Q-worshipping thread would cause a backlash.

Oh, no FW! Are the Qbirds picking on you again? Come sit by Uncle Bags. I won't let 'em get ya.

[SkyPilot]

You.

[grey_whiskers]

I have a tendency to forget how thin-skinned and prickly the Q-believers are. Personally, I found the discussion re whether Q is Alex Jones or Bannon very interesting and thought-provoking. I should have realized that mentioning it on the Q-worshipping thread would cause a backlash. It must not be considered sufficiently reverential.

No, it's that on an earlier Q thread you were sanctimonious and condescendingly telling people you *knew* who Q was, once a certain date had been brought to your attention.

Then you changed your mind on the basis of "further reading" but did not consider yourself discredited.

Now you are shoring up mere speculation at best, even though Q has pointed out that it is the American People who are vital.

Here, let me give you a quarter so you can buy some bubble-gum-machine pearls to clutch whilst you faint onto a couch over your having been called out AGAIN as a troll.

[JockoManning]

I have a tendency to forget how thin-skinned and prickly the Q-believers are.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ... Your decorum crown is slipping.