[grey_whiskers]

I’m sorry, but admitting you had never heard of Jack Barlow or his work is NOT a sign of erudite thinking or even basic current knowledge.

Why not? Is the EFF the only field of human endeavor?

Like Willie & Joe from the World War II Stars & Stripes magazine: "The hell this isn't the most important foxhole in the War -- I'm in it!"

But, in your haste to score cheap points, you missed the essential issue. Or maybe you're dodging it because, really, you have nothing but RINO swamp fear.

How did Q know to mention Barlow, in the context of targeted assassinations, a week before Barlow died?

(FR got passed as the cutting edge 5 years ago.)

He was instrumental in the EFF, and had been ill since abut 3 or 4 years ago. It was a heart attack or stroke back then, I’m don’t remember.

So you're saying "plausible deniability."

Enough of those, and people stop assuming coincidences, despite your best efforts to spread FUD.

Nice try though.

[Strac6]

I tried to make this easy and gentle for you, but let me be a little more direct.

Just because you and your limited view of the world outside your double-wide had not heard of Jack Barlow does not make Q posts anything more than the scam they are.