Q: DEFUSING THE NWO BOMB

Youtube ^ | Published on Jan 27, 2018 | SGTreport

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Trump storms Davos like a BOSS, New Q drops confirm Q is for real, and Hillary Clinton and the rest of the globalist puppets no longer laughing.Video is a little over 5 minutes.

****************

LUKE 8:17

For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

I’m in the unconvinced category.

In the mean time, this is as good a story as I’ve ever read!

My tag line says the rest.

[867V309]

Thanks so much, that’s half. What about Q’s? On the video its timestamp is 12:09:31 but no AM or PM.

I’d like to see proof if we’re going to call this guy a liar.

[Vision Thing]

The timestamps on twitter and 8chan indicate no timezone, so that can lead to major confusion. I'm guessing Trump's tweet was at 3:55 am eastern time. Not sure about the 8 chan post. So I looked through one of the Friday night/Saturday morning threads here on FR, and found the first mention of Q's post had a FR timestamp of around 12:30 pm eastern. That's close to 9 hours after Trump's tweet.

Nonetheless, Q has not indicated that this post was supposed to prove Q's ability to predict the content of Trump's tweet. So this shouldn't serve as an example that Q is a phony. Instead, Q was merely reiterating Trump's tweet.

[867V309]

The timestamps on twitter and 8chan indicate no timezone, so that can lead to major confusion.

well, earlier you stated categorically:
In reply 21, Beach333 pointed out that Trump tweeted before Q posted. I looked into it just now, and Beach333 is correct.

Now you don't seem so positive--"major confusion"

It seems to me neither you nor Beach333 have proof of anything.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Hmmm.

[ransomnote]

Q ping

I’m stealing description bitt used in her ping list:
“ping to Davos wrap up, Q crumbs and blatant calling out of DWS, etc...

video is 5:36 long..”

[tiki]

It could be said that we are already at T.

[tiki]

As I’ve said before, if it is true, it is exciting but if it isn’t it is like an exciting novel with new chapters every day.

[Cboldt]

I follow Trump's tweeting in roughly real time, and just happened to be following Q posts Friday night and Saturday. Trump's tweet came first, no doubt in my mind.

Relevant Q post : 01/27/18 (Sat) 12:09:31 No.67 <- after noon, not after midnight. Posts use 24 hour "military time."

Trump tweet : 6:55 AM - 27 Jan 2018

My post of Q messages in close to realtime.

Timestamps on Q and tweet are my local time, EST on that day.

[PMAS]

On hitler in the bunker thing - you should watch the show “Hunting Hitler” on the History Channel

[madison10]

Again with the bird talking/singing. Is someone meaning “singing like a canary” as in fingering lots of people? They have someone who is telling everything. If so, good.

[Vision Thing]

First of all, although I am skeptical of Q, I am nontheless on Team Q because Q seems to share my love for MAGA. And also because Q is fascinating and entertaining to me.

That said, I said the timestamps between twitter and 8chan are difficult to compare with one another. Why? Because both offer no indication of time zone.

If you had read past this, I then explained that I used FR to verify the timestamp of the Q posting. How? First off, FR posts include timezone info. Secondly, FReepers are on top of Q drops at all hours of the day, so as soon as Q drops a post, a FReeper will post it here within minutes. So given these two FR facts, anyone can find out the timezone-based timestamp of a Q post.

So, given that (1) Trump tweeted between 3:55 and 6:55 am eastern and (2) Q definitely posted around 12:30 pm (based on the first FR mention of it), then this means Trump tweeted before Q posted on 8chan.

And to reiterate, this is no big deal for you, me, and everyone else on Team Q. Q has made no claims that his post was supposed predict Trump's tweet. And I'll also reiterate that Q was merely reiterating Trump.

[BlueMondaySkipper]

That makes perfect sense. The follow-up question would be: Which side are you on?

[Vision Thing]

Thanks Cboldt! Actually, your reply on Swordmaker's awesome Q thread on Friday night/Saturday morning was the first mention of Q's "catch and release" drop. I had used the FR timestamp on your reply to determine that Q's drop was much later in the day than Trump's tweet.

Your three links make this plain as day.

[Axenolith]

If the assets are frozen you still have them. Obviously he consented to losing 60-80% of his wealth to the Saudi gov for freedom, as has been part and parcel for others in their crackdown.

You, are picking nits...

[Vision Thing]

Could the singing bird be dopey alwaleed? And if so, has dopey alwaleed sung enough of the secret song that it helped him win his freedom from bin Salmam?

[JockoManning]

Mark Taylor seems to be indicating that 3 Supreme Court Justices may be indicted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asHeOo29F8U

What legally could happen in such a case?

What are the Constitutional mechanisms to take down a Supreme Court Justice that is found to be guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors?

He talks a fair amount about high ranking folks being locked up.

[Louis Foxwell]

Q? Are you paying attention to what is happening?

[familyop]

17
Learn the code.
3 squeaks, 3 notes.
What am I speaking from?
Q

[familyop]

Read this now.
Think about it later.
Pull my finger to decipher.

;-)