Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GoldenState_Rose

The question of alphabet is purely political in this context. Your link correctly points out at cultural aspect of script usage but it fails to explain how exactly Latin would help Turkic people to better exercise their identity. Latin is more alien for Central Asia that Cyrillic for sure and the idea of it is to inflict a cultural split between Russia and Central Asia realigning the latter to China and Muslim world.
Why not Arabic alphabet if so?
I also fail to see the benefits of all the above for the West pushing the agenda in the first place. It makes about as much sense as if Russia was campaigning in Southwest for switching to Spanish ‘for Hispanics to better exercise their identity’.


72 posted on 02/22/2018 4:44:31 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: NorseViking

You write like a Russian. Are you Russian?


76 posted on 03/13/2018 4:18:11 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: NorseViking

Moving to the Latin alphabet makes it easier for both westerners to “read” some Kazakh and for kazakhs to learn Western languages. At the same time it makes modern technology like phone keyboards easier to use for Kazakhs if they want to import them from Latin alphabet countries (though I agree that’s not a big plus point)_


78 posted on 03/13/2018 5:32:29 AM PDT by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson