I was told what a stand up guy he was before he got the position.
Which means they might have had some dirt on him (EVERYONE has something in their closet they want to keep there) or Mueller told him they ARE going to get Trump and he will be next if he doesn’t play ball.
Either way, he should have been gone a long time ago as this WHOLE investigation mess if because of him
I was told what a stand up guy he was before he got the position. Which means they might have had some dirt on him (EVERYONE has something in their closet they want to keep there) or Mueller told him they ARE going to get Trump and he will be next if he doesn’t play ball. Either way, he should have been gone a long time ago as this WHOLE investigation mess if because of him
LS has been a staunch advocate for Jeff Sessions all along, and while I've tended to give some credence to his stance—that the AG is doing yeoman's work behind the scenes, and (properly) keeping a very tight lid on it—I am also reminded of LS's recent reporting on the story that several of President Trump's cabinet members have supposedly been "leveraged" (extorted), and are therefore being used to undermine him. This information is part of these "new" revelations—revelations which supposedly indicate how much worse things really are at DOJ/FBI/Deep State than what any of us can even imagine.
Now, we suddenly see DOJ trying to suppress the release of this memo, and consequently shielding Obama's FBI/DOJ—and apparently against the wishes of both the President and GOP Congressional leaders, such as Intelligence Committee Chairman Nunez. An obvious possibility presents itself—what if the Attorney General is one of these "leveraged" cabinet members? Why is Sessions' DOJ so fervently resisting the will of its own President on this memo issue?
Even cautious figures like Senator Chuck Grassley are scoffing at DOJ's suggestion that the release of this memo must be postponed due to some kind of ambiguous "national security" concerns.
As things currently stand, my default loyalty—and my gut sense of who can make an informed decision—lies with President Trump and Chairman Nunez. It seems to me like AG Sessions is showing too much institutional loyalty to the Justice Department—and it strikes me as somewhat "automatic", undeserved, and possibly even "blind".