Posted on 01/27/2018 11:53:28 AM PST by ransomnote
You have a link for that other one?
Oh, my—another familiar name. Howdy.
You clearly do not grok what he’s about.
Read post #16.
Or quidam during the Ken Starr days
It is online as OANN. It is on some cable and on Roku
Not sure what to make of these post. I think plain speak would be much better.
To repeat:
1. Research into NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) has proven that in some contexts--actually quite a few--oblique, even paradoxical and even mysterious and obscure language has more potency with longer lasting results for important goals than plain speaking. See Bandler & Grinder: THE STRUCTURE OF MAGIC...
2. Fairly often, direct, plain-speak (our preference, too) tends to quickly trigger a kind of fierce, entrenched, stubborn polarity response. That perspective, stance then becomes very very difficult to dislodge.
3. You can see this in response to my plain speaking hereon fairly often. I don't practice what I preach on this score because I value plain speaking so highly I fail to adjust when it would be wiser to do so. Silly me.
4. Q-Anon's style achieves a lot of difficult to achieve and crucial goals in this national context. Patriots with a passion for the Nation sufficient to search out answers to his/their questions become invested in helping their social network take the resulting red pill content. People who work for and earn their own insights handle such information far better than people preached at.
This comes up so often, I guess I need to copy this so I can paste it in repeatedly. Sigh.
OK. Thanks.
Gab is a twitter alternative.
2. You don't have to believe the research. Many folks disbelieve lots of facts.
Q has been posting since Oct 28. He’s got more than 600 under his belt. Hard to jump in now and figure it all out. Look up what Corsi has to say. He’ll bring you up to date. Check this out. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tyZET5a5MRA
“As a matter of honor, one man owes it to another to manifest the truth.” ~ Thomas Aquinas
There’s gab, but until people use it, twitter is it.
I think Christ was that way. Gentle and patient with the decent common folks and fiercely hostile to the pharisees--with the latter probably because He knew they would not, could not hear and chose to lay it all out in starkly pointed terms for the teaching effect on the community--and maybe the odd teachable pharisee.
>>181208
Mourn.
Murder.
Heart attack.
Coincidence?
I checked to see what happened on Dec. 18, 2008. Deep Throat died. Any connection to what’s going on now?
Sorry, but I can not accept something as being true that is ‘coded’ in such a way that I must trust others interruption of it. Seems to me that such is a tactic of the ‘elite’ to code something in such a way that the great ‘unwashed’ can not understand it and must be shown the meaning remedially.
You talk of facts and people who refuse to believe them, but isn’t believing something with no base of fact worse?
Q-Anon has thrown his stuff to the common people to decode. He has called for, assigned, asked, the common people to go on Twitter and call for the release of the 4 page memo.
He is clearly calling for the common citizens to research, prepare themselves to help their social networks and the culture at large to take their red pills.
Q-Anon is actually a TRUMP led/Trump assigned ANTI-ELITE project to gradually prepare the culture for horrendous changes--particularly to how the DimRats--particularly the elite in politics, entertainment, media etc are seen--to be seen as the traitorous criminals they and RINO's have become.
The issue between a false positive error vs a false negative error is one of balance. A ton of scientific research has demonstrated that WHEN on leans sooooooo far over backwards constantly trying to avoid a false positive error, they set themselves up to a virtual certainty of getting bit hard in the rear by a false negative error. And vice versa. And one type of the two major error types is just as deadly as the other.
Personality seems to play a huge part in the tendency of many to bow at the altar of avoiding a false positive error. Those who are more OCD, more narrow, more rigid, more given to control-freak stuff, etc. etc.--those sorts lean almost constantly in behalf of fierce avoidance of risking a false positive error. That merely sets them up to virtually CERTAIN devastations from false negative errors.
The only way to avoid such is to balance the two and take each case on a case by case basis.
Those addicted to avoiding a false positive error seem to be incapable of such a balanced perspective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.