Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tomkat

“If I were Q, privy to high level intel myself or via a 3rd party source, and my goal was the intel’s broad dissemination, I would likely employ vagueness:”

Sorry if I sounded snarky - it just doesn’t add up. People privy to classified Intel don’t mouth off on social media unless they a) have permission to share something, or b) they are a whistleblower, in which case they want to expose it - if the goal is to expose something, you need details, not vagueness.


383 posted on 01/27/2018 12:12:47 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated

Time will tell.
Fingers crossed.
Death to the deep state !
cheers


385 posted on 01/27/2018 12:26:38 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: enumerated
...if the goal is to expose something, you need details, not vagueness.

Y'all might do better with the Q-Anon stuff if you could loosen up enough to think outside the box of your stereotypical thought patterns.

In some contexts, toward some goals, vagueness, cryptic clever stuff is THE style of choice. That's just a proven fact. Study NLP--Neuro Linguistic Programming.

Sheesh. It's not really that hard, folks.

401 posted on 01/28/2018 5:27:42 AM PST by JockoManning (to cpy/paste if want: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Haiku-For-The-End-Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson