Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MNDude

That would start a civil war.

The military has no legal authority to arrest.

And after eight years of Obama, the military is not the same.


241 posted on 01/26/2018 8:29:21 PM PST by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum

Probably been tightened up a bit in the last year.


246 posted on 01/26/2018 8:32:59 PM PST by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

And if there are many videos showing these people harming children, do you think most people would join in on the side of evil? You are right, it is going to be a civil war. But I think it’s going to be a short-lived one.


264 posted on 01/26/2018 9:07:00 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum
If you read Q's earlier posts, he asks what look like Socratic, leading questions which indicate that under specific, limited circumstances (which he did NOT delineate), that the use of the military to try citizens (military tribunals) is both lawful and constitutional; he hints that such is an effucacious means of cleaning out the corruption in government while doing an end-run around the liberal courts packed with left-wing ringers masquerading as judges.

Incidentally, somewhere I read that Congressional investigations recognize nether spousal privilege nor attorney-client privilege--my own take on that us that both are legal *conventions* but are not explicitly listed as Constitutional *protections*.

331 posted on 01/27/2018 6:01:21 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson