To: MNDude
That would start a civil war.
The military has no legal authority to arrest.
And after eight years of Obama, the military is not the same.
To: redgolum
Probably been tightened up a bit in the last year.
246 posted on
01/26/2018 8:32:59 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: redgolum
And if there are many videos showing these people harming children, do you think most people would join in on the side of evil? You are right, it is going to be a civil war. But I think it’s going to be a short-lived one.
264 posted on
01/26/2018 9:07:00 PM PST by
MNDude
To: redgolum
If you read Q's earlier posts, he asks what look like Socratic, leading questions which indicate that under specific, limited circumstances (which he did NOT delineate), that the use of the military to try citizens (military tribunals) is both lawful and constitutional; he hints that such is an effucacious means of cleaning out the corruption in government while doing an end-run around the liberal courts packed with left-wing ringers masquerading as judges.
Incidentally, somewhere I read that Congressional investigations recognize nether spousal privilege nor attorney-client privilege--my own take on that us that both are legal *conventions* but are not explicitly listed as Constitutional *protections*.
331 posted on
01/27/2018 6:01:21 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson