Posted on 01/24/2018 8:02:36 PM PST by ransomnote
The following content is from an anon (anonymous poster on the same type of boars that Q uses) that preceded Q, via Brenden Dilley, Congressional candidate. The content is compatible with the information I've reviewed so far but offers greater level of detail and key clarification.
This 2 min. video shows the same technique used by Cathy Newman interviewing Mr. Peterson.
Before the interview begins, Ms. Newman is cordial, open, welcoming, pleasant, and friendly.
This is done to mislead and disarm the defenses of the mark/victim.
The mark is then at ease believing he's going to engage in a mutually respectful and reasoned discussion.
Once the interview begins, the gloves come off and the knives come out.
The mark is stunned and caught off guard. He looks confused because he is confused by the dramatic change in the situation. If he's not aware of what's going on he's going to be made to look guilty or a bumbling fool.
Any conservative who agrees to an interview with any media person must be knowledgeable as to what to expect and how to defend themselves.
As friendly as they may first appear members of the Democratic Media Complex are not your friend.
They are the enemy. They are not your friend. They are there to destroy both you and your ideology.
The Bob Newhart Show - Bob's Television Appearance Gone Wrong 1972
Well then, you can't really back up your assertions, can you?
For the record, I'm willing to accept a fellow Freeper's contention if they make a logical argument, or attest to having read a verifiable, well sourced account of a story, somewhere.
They claim to have looked then make claims anyone who had looked would know are false. This then means they havnt looked and are just trolling the posters who always take the bait or they have looked and make the statements not to make an argument with the poster but to stop others from investigating for themselves. While its possible than some have looked at the drops and not went further, it is unlikely that the curious type to take a look would just stop there.
I cant figure out why some waste so much time re-engaging unless thats part of the shtick too.
Google McCain boot... the one at his daughters wedding was Nov 22, ‘17... there was a previous one just before where boot was on other foot.
Sorry about that!
Just waiting for some evidence that Q’s posts have some value other than just adding more questions to the already overloaded pile. And until I see that evidence, it appears to be a worthless diversion. Since some don’t believe that, we are having some diagreements. Thanks!
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
Q Anon: Some housekeeping rules that will keep the place tidy
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
Q Anon: What lies ahead and how might we be able support our country {correction to title}
My Notes: Pedophilia in the D.C. Swamp, A Friendly Caution to FReepers
Interviewing Liz Crokin on The Storm, QAnon, Pedogate, & Twitter Feuds (Jan 2, 2018)
Q Post believed to be President Trump’s words to prepare you for today
Q drop #601 (meaning is combination of image and file name of image){correction to org. title}
Q drop #600 (Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally retained counsel=PARTYTIME!!!)
Q Anon: Some of the layers of organization within the New World Order
Q Drops #541-#547 & #549 dated 1/18/2018:photo gallery of (in)famous people
(NOT Q) Content seems to offer greater detail and some clarification re storm
Q drop #29: Reason for cryptic format, North Korea is “directed”, pedophiles
Q drop #153 (stirring words re Trump’s decision to seek office,Hillary’s reaction)
Informal Q drop to Q researchers (1/25/18)
Q drop #597 (FBI:first meeting of “secret society” on the night Trump won election)
Q Ping: The New World Order’s plan to kill most of us and makes survivors slaves
Q Anon - More about Q Drop #556. Is this “Checkmate”?
If this is overloading you then why not just skip over the Q threads instead of trashing the other poster’s ideas? Why stress yourself? It just seems you are in overdrive to convince others it is fake.
You bring up something that has been on the back of my brain pan for a while now. In other words, you have triggered me. I don't have this thought fully fleshed out, so I'll do what I do. Just get to typin'.
Windy, I don't know if you're old enough to remember a time before Algore's internet, but I am. I remember it well. And I am also fascinated by history.
Throughout mankind's existence and before we had the internet. when a group of men were talking to each other, and one man made an assertion, did anybody ask him for a link? Did anybody say, "Pics or it didn't happen?" No, they did not. It would have been ridiculous. Nobody knew what a link was. Nobody carried a set of encyclopedias or a photo album around with them.
Without this level of proof, how is it you ask, that men communicated? A worthy question, and I will take a stab. You need to know this.
A man made a statement, and the veracity of it was backed by his reputation. And his honor. To be called a liar on those times was a grave insult and, during certain periods, could result in violence, duels, and even the loss of life.
Were those better times? That is open to discussion. I happen to think so. I like the idea of a man building a reputation over a lifetime and standing on it and defending it. I like the idea of honor and defending that as well.
To bring us back to the present. I back up my statement with my reputation, which you may not be aware of. And I back up my statement with my honor. I take great pride in thinking of myself as an honest man. If I say I have seen a picture of Chels in a boot. Either I have, or I am mistaken, I have made mistakes like that before. My memory is not what it used to be, or I have actually seen it.
You can take any statement I ever make as one that I believe I am telling the truth. If I end up being mistaken, I will admit it. I will not require myself EVER to provide a link or pics to prove I am telling what I believe to be the truth. Besides, I can post links or pics. I'm honest, but retarded.
Anyway. A couple of smart guys posted Chels in a boot pic on this thread. So the point is moot.
Did you see the one of Huma in YUGE bell bottoms? Shaky business, right?
On Dec 14, Q said something to the effect of, "Why did seven people travel to an undisclosed, guarded location to have a meeting the day after the election?"
In light of the "secret society" revelations and the Senator that said they had an informant giving information of the so called secret society and their meetings, what do you make of that?
Always ALWAYS remember. Big Redd is watching. :)
Big Red? I just want you to know a thing. You have NO idea how hard it is for me not to curse. In real life, it's just about all I do. If I ain't cursin', I ain't livin'.
But for you, I've been trying real hard. I swear I have. I slip ocassionaly. Dang,how do you spell that. I will stay mindful and try harder.
A point well made, goodman.
Spoiler alert. At one point he renders her speechless. So fun to watch.
The date I saw on that Q post was January 23, not December 14, per the other thread. Got a link?
You’re speaking German, yet your screen name is Irish Guard. You’re confusing me. :)
Gahhh...I can’t do links. But the Dec 14 drop is all over the Q threads. At this time, you will have to take my word for it. There is a Q drop with, amongst other things, that question. To me, it’s very convincing. That’s the one that finally fully convinced me. Maybe somebody will see this post and link it. Or you could go find it, though I know how hard that would be.
Can somebody please link the Dec 14 Q post? The one with the “meeting after the election” question? Golden Eagle is willing to take a look at it.
p.s. You may be thinking of the Q post that talks about a December meeting with a list of names including Holder and Patreus. That one may be from January. But this one doesn’t give any names. Just “seven guys” or “seven people.”
Then you shouldn't be surprised if no one believes anything you have to say. Thanks!
Please don't call me a liar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.