Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRAPPIST-1 Planets Could Have Substantial Surface Water
www.popularmechanics.com ^ | Jan 24, 2018 | By Jay Bennett

Posted on 01/24/2018 11:42:04 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
NOTE:

ALL THESE PLANETS ARE CLOSER TO THEIR STAR THAN MERCURY IS TO OURS.....................SEE BOTTOM PIC...............

1 posted on 01/24/2018 11:42:04 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

EXOPLANET PING!...................


2 posted on 01/24/2018 11:42:37 AM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

OOOOOOR, they could not.


3 posted on 01/24/2018 11:54:15 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Of course water could be common. Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe and oxygen is the third most common element in the universe so who could be stupid enough to think that it is rare anywhere but here. Water will be water here, on Jupiter’s moons, in comets, so by extrapolation how far do you have to go before water isn’t there anymore? And since carbon is the fourth most common element in the universe, it stands to reason that carbon dioxide and methane will be very common as well.


4 posted on 01/24/2018 11:59:13 AM PST by webheart (Grammar police on the scene.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Planet Earth has earthlings.

Planet Mars would have martians.

Planet e has......eepers?


5 posted on 01/24/2018 11:59:52 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Mars Needs Women.


6 posted on 01/24/2018 12:00:41 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It says they’re tidally locked such that you have a permanent hot side and a permanent cold side. But you also have permanent shadow zones. Where you could grow barley. And hops. Yes. This could be the mythical Planet Of Beer.


7 posted on 01/24/2018 12:02:29 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart

And another thing, planets are not internally heated by tidal forces, they are heated by decay of unstable heavy elements.


8 posted on 01/24/2018 12:03:13 PM PST by webheart (Grammar police on the scene.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Don’t we all.


9 posted on 01/24/2018 12:05:34 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Trappist 1 is an ultra cool red dwarf of about 0.09 solar masses, just a bit over the minimum for a proton-proton reaction, and a surface temperature of about 2500K.
Since this is a red dwarf, it can have the tendency to flare frequently. Not being a physicist or cosmologist (I’m just an engineer), I suspect that low mass stars that are fully convective may also tend to do a good amount of flaring.


10 posted on 01/24/2018 12:10:34 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
More exoplanet exahype!
Are astronomy research proposals for grant renewals due soon?!?
11 posted on 01/24/2018 12:30:29 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

North Korean Flair:

12 posted on 01/24/2018 12:31:17 PM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

these jackwagons, always with the “could”s and “may”s.
Please give us some real science.


13 posted on 01/24/2018 12:31:27 PM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nobody needs that movie.


14 posted on 01/24/2018 1:08:55 PM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I figured that when I saw how short their orbital periods were in the other chart.


15 posted on 01/24/2018 1:17:37 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

They could be wrong, though.

For decades they told us Mercury was ‘tidally locked’ and only one side faced the Sun, then they found out they were wrong. It turns, slowly, but it turns.....................


16 posted on 01/24/2018 1:22:39 PM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wouldn’t that tidal locking create a massive thermal differential, and result in hurricane winds?


17 posted on 01/24/2018 1:28:18 PM PST by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

If there’s an atmosphere................


18 posted on 01/24/2018 1:31:30 PM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: webheart

“Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe and oxygen is the third most common element in the universe so who could be stupid enough to think that it is rare anywhere but here. “

The facts you mention while suggesting conditions for combining hydrogen and oxygen into water may exist with exo-planets in other solar systems, it is that combining of the two elements, and the conditions for it, which may NOT BE so abundant in the universe. If the mere existence of how much hydrogen and oxygen go to make up the known gases in the universe was the COMMON AND ESSENTIAL ingredient for estimating how often water “ought to be” present, then it would certainly be more present even in our own solar system than empirical science has determined so far.

Just take our own planet and what is described as key factors that make its ability to contain water - distance from our star and other factors, yet scientists still debate whether water was present in what went to make up the earth from the solar disk, or if it arrived early in the course of earth history from asteroids and other bodies that pelted the early earth. And none of the scientists on either side of that debate argue that water is here merely because of how “common” are hydrogen and oxygen.


19 posted on 01/24/2018 2:21:58 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sure a lot of assumptions in this article.


20 posted on 01/24/2018 6:18:27 PM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson