Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
-- I reluctantly ask for a take back on definite Q confirmation. --

Why so on this point? Not that the number of people is confirmed, or even a meeting on that day, but the sooner a specific claim is made, the better the chance of it being credible if shown true later.

Unverified report of another meeting, December 2016

63 posted on 01/23/2018 8:35:28 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

I’m sure there’s more than a dozen in the inner circle, but great find! Here’s names of people in the meeting:

“Robert Mueller, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, James Clapper, Leon Panetta, Phill Mud, David Petraeus, Michael Hayden & former Attorney General Eric Holder.”

Kind of shocking to see Petreaus’s name there.


73 posted on 01/23/2018 8:51:30 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
That link you provided cites another meeting in December.

My revised position is this. Q talked about a meeting of seven guys in a guarded location the night AFTER THE ELECTION on NOVEMBER 14.

I say that, if that is confirmed, and I think it soon will be by the Senators snitch, then that is DEFINITE Q confirmation. I would like some solid to push in the face of the Q deniers.

Am I wrong or off base?

80 posted on 01/23/2018 9:08:59 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson