Awww, really? It says that in there? Well hell. There goes my brilliant "seven guy" theory. I thought I had it nailed.
Booo me.
I reluctantly ask for a take back on definite Q confirmation.
The particular article I remember then being alluded to was one that lamented the election night heartbreak on HRC side. It was a side mention ala ‘the next day folks gathered ...’ - there was another of these a week or so ago that had similar reflection but the one that was found at the time of “Q” mention was different (there may have been a photo with the article of Clinton HQ on the night of the election with Sick Willy looking at a TV in a room with shocked people) ...
Why so on this point? Not that the number of people is confirmed, or even a meeting on that day, but the sooner a specific claim is made, the better the chance of it being credible if shown true later.