Posted on 01/20/2018 2:44:04 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
Bkmk anon info
Oooh, that's a bingo.
Is that how you say it?
My understanding is that Tillerson fired the 7th floor on Feb. 7, 2017
Having incredibly astute, refined, brilliant perceptive and assessment skills must make you a crack interpreter of the Q-Anon stuff.
Thanks for the thread.
I will stick with Sundance and Andrew McCarthy. They speak coherent English.
My suspension record (and it is vast) can attest to this.
Chased off literally hundreds of users
His most dastardly crime.
Oh and to top it all off he is a big cry baby. He can dish it out and when you go back at him he hides behind mommys skirt.
Spit.
Double Grizzly snuff spit.
Please don’t tell me that humblegunner is a moderator.
I’ve loved FR since its inception. Was a lurker several years prior to joining.
I’ve noticed a change recently like agitator trolls have invaded.
Let me run to my laptop to show you reformedliberal’s analysis of Q’s syntax and prose.
A tough assignment even for you.
Is that Alan from ‘ 2 1/2 Men’ on the right?
From what I’ve gleaned from various boards/posts/interpretations, this is a Socratic teaching method designed to gently awaken the populace. By asking targeted questions that are often clarified by following questions & sometimes statements, the listener/reader is challenged to think along different lines while the questioner/teacher doesn’t reveal classified intel or violate autonomy with brute force pedagogy. It is an instance of connect-the-dots that appeals to people who love puzzles &/or who have _some_ information and need a nudge to get to the next level.
I’ve seen it explained that dropping this Swamp info in toto, without preparation, is considered to be so destabilizing as to be impossible. In fact, that fear of destabilization is one of the reasons the swamp things have survived intact for so long. Stupid Hillary actually gave it away when she proclaimed that pursuing her for criminal actions would bring down the US system. Because of all the info already public, this did not serve to scare off the people who are on to her, but, instead galvanized them to dig deeper.
Blunt clarity (flat-out statements)delineate the target, which can then focus on irrelevancies and redirect the argument to nit-picks. Targeted questions arranged in logical order eventually make the researcher/listener focus on the form, which, IMO at this point in time, is fractal. You see the same organization and the same players using the same format over and over from tiny 3-4 person/organization groups to overarching, global corporate/governmental constructs. The small group conspirators within the various governmental divisions follow the same patterns of hierarchy as something like the UN. Q makes this obvious, but he/it doesn’t do it bombastically. The goal is make us think, direct the though pathways and once a person does that, they own the information by virtue of having worked for it.
I’ve been fascinated by *conspiracy theory* and these *occult* (means hidden) organizations for decades. There are links and similarities throughout. They aim to influence diverse areas of human endeavor.
IMO, Q is on a global red-pill mission too vast for simple information transfers. Info dumps make the eyes glaze over. Connecting the dots yourself is active participation.
Once these methods and conclusions are seeded throughout the populace, they cannot be as easily countered through refocusing or loud screeching over single words or minor deviations. By now, Q could disappear or be disappeared and even if a global coercive system was installed (likely one of the original swamp goals), the thought patterns of millions has already been altered and takes on a life of its own.
Q and whomever is behind it considers the people of the world as an active participant in the battle for its own freedom and survival. I’d say, provisionally, the Q posts and puzzles are a recruitment device.
One final thought: words mean things. Q presents with a huge vocabulary and word choice, while sometimes arcane (specialized)or seemingly obscure, is important. Q is actually extremely precise, while not didactic. Nuance is important in the communications because searching for implication stretches the mind and reveals further information. You could use a dictionary and thesaurus to translate Q into common parlance and, in doing so, lose layers of information contained in the precise vocabulary.
71 posted on 1/19/2018, 7:54:55 AM by reformedliberal
Yes, it is.
I don't think so. We would have heard if Gitmo was suddenly overpopulated with Bloggers.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.