Your criteria comes across as haughty and unreachable to your standards.
Most reasonable folks would have fair-mindedly considered our answers and either accepted them straight away or adjusted their sensibilities however much needed and either wait to see about more evidence or gone on down the road.
You, however, seem to have a huge investment in winning a competition ... evidently for ego reasons ... while castigating the community for not living their lives according to your standards and prescriptions.
Wellllllllll, whoop-T-doo! to that. That's not our interest or value. We are sufficiently satisfied with the proofs very evident and persistent in the Q stuff to keep us interested and watchful. We find the assertions plausible and congruent. We are encouraged by the evidently looming probability in the evil doers being brought to justice and their wealth confiscated.
However, if you wish to sit on the curb with your thumb in your mouth; stamp your feet and pout because the world is not conforming itself to your image in such matters--have at it. Just don't expect us to join you.
We are sufficiently satisfied with the evidence presented. Our sensibilities and criteria are evidently not as 'lofty' or prissy as yours.
If you want to live in the past, trying to determine if Q left you some possible clue a week ago, in some cryptic post that could have meant anything, in retrospect and in the aftermath of an event that has already happened as well, then knock yourself out. Because you've already admitted that Q will never provide you enough information in advance, to accurately predict any specific event in the future. If you disagree with me that that is fairly pointless, then we can just agree to disagree. Thanks!