Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning
Your criteria comes across as haughty and unreachable to your standards.

If you want to live in the past, trying to determine if Q left you some possible clue a week ago, in some cryptic post that could have meant anything, in retrospect and in the aftermath of an event that has already happened as well, then knock yourself out. Because you've already admitted that Q will never provide you enough information in advance, to accurately predict any specific event in the future. If you disagree with me that that is fairly pointless, then we can just agree to disagree. Thanks!

196 posted on 01/16/2018 7:33:24 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "I'm disappointed in the Attorney General. He should not have recused himself immediately...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
...that could have meant anything...

Is simply not true. It's paradoxical that you scream at Q for not being precise enough and yet your own precision with words is greatly fudged.

Certainly we can agree to disagree.

201 posted on 01/16/2018 7:40:10 PM PST by JockoManning (to cpy/paste if want: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Haiku-For-The-End-Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson